blackcandy

A self hosted music streaming server

Runssource: GitHubRubyMITcommit 6c36030c60c6

Ruby, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: audio, hotwire, music, music player, music streaming, musicplayer, rails and ruby.

blackcandy runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 14 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Black Candy Rails 8.1.3 app runs on Ruby 4.0.2 with SQLite, all 416 tests pass, server responds on port 3002

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.08 (measured)
recorded runs
3
last tested
stars
4,431
forks
228
open issues
32
watchers
23
size
12 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing blackcandy, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Ruby 4.0.2 not installed in container7 minutes
  • pg gem native extension failed (libpq-dev headers missing)3 minutes
  • libvips.so.42 missing causing test failure2 minutes
Install time
14 minutes
Cold machine to finish
16 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
bin/rails test exited 0: 416 runs, 1049 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors; rails server answered 200 on /up and 401 on / (auth required)
Model tokens used
329,248
Exact commit tested
6c36030c60c6
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

**App launch**: Rails 8.1.3 boots on Puma, responds `HTTP 200` on `/up` and `HTTP 401` on `/` (auth…
**Tests**: `bin/rails test` — 416 runs, 1049 assertions, **0 failures, 0 errors**.
tokens used
329,248
Here's the final report:
**Install succeeded**: Ruby 4.0.2 compiled from source, all gem dependencies installed, npm depende…
**Errors encountered and fixed**:
1. **Ruby not in container** — Compiled Ruby 4.0.2 from source with locally built libffi, libyaml, …
2. **pg gem (PostgreSQL) native extension failed** — libpq-dev headers missing. Downloaded libpq-de…
3. **libvips missing** — Downloaded libvips42t64 + all transitive dependencies (libcfitsio, libimag…
**App launch**: Rails 8.1.3 boots on Puma, responds `HTTP 200` on `/up` and `HTTP 401` on `/` (auth…
**Tests**: `bin/rails test` — 416 runs, 1049 assertions, **0 failures, 0 errors**.

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 3 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 14 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 17 comparable projects Argusic has measured.

Of the 18 audio projects Argusic has installed and timed, blackcandy was the 11th fastest to reach a running state, and 15 of 18 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner3/3Runs100.000.08
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.22
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.31

Topics (from GitHub)

audiohotwiremusicmusic-playermusic-streamingmusicplayerrailsrubyself-hosted

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/blackcandy.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/blackcandy)

Questions

Does blackcandy run?
Yes. blackcandy runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 14 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test blackcandy?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 6c36030c60c6. 3 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test blackcandy?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.08: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does blackcandy take to install?
14 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does blackcandy need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing blackcandy?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does blackcandy compare with the alternatives?
Of the 18 audio projects Argusic has installed and timed, blackcandy was the 11th fastest to reach a running state, and 15 of 18 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for blackcandy?
All 3 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion