rustic

rustic - fast, encrypted, and deduplicated backups powered by Rust

Runssource: GitHubhomepageRustApache-2.0commit 143d073f6039

Rust, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: backup, deduplication, encryption, hacktoberfest, restic and rust.

rustic runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 10.5 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

rustic 0.11.4 builds from source, the binary runs, and the full test suite passes (69/75 tests pass, 6 ignored as CI/release-only)

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.07 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
3,291
forks
145
open issues
189
watchers
18
size
8 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
11 minutes
Cold machine to finish
27 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
cargo test exited 0, 69 passed 6 ignored; ./target/debug/rustic --help and --version returned correctly
Model tokens used
147,787
Exact commit tested
143d073f6039
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

   Doc-tests rustic_rs
running 0 tests
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
All 69 tests passed (6 ignored, which are CI-only or release-only tests). Let me also quickly verif…
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'cd /work/repo && . $HOME/.cargo/env && ./target/debug/rustic --version 2>&1' in /work/…
 succeeded in 0ms:
rustic 0.11.4
All tests passed - here's the final report.
tokens used
147,787
All tests passed - here's the final report.

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 10.5 minutes, faster than the median of the 8 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 9 backup projects Argusic has installed and timed, rustic was the 5th fastest to reach a running state, and 7 of 9 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • Following its own README: the documented path worked with nothing to fix.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.07

Topics (from GitHub)

backupdeduplicationencryptionhacktoberfestresticrust

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/rustic.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/rustic)

Questions

Does rustic run?
Yes. rustic runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 11 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test rustic?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 143d073f6039. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test rustic?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.07: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does rustic take to install?
10.5 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does rustic need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing rustic?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
How does rustic compare with the alternatives?
Of the 9 backup projects Argusic has installed and timed, rustic was the 5th fastest to reach a running state, and 7 of 9 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for rustic?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion