autorestic

Config driven, easy backup cli for restic.

Runssource: GitHubhomepageGoApache-2.0commit 496a8cc3afbb

Go, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: backup, cli, config, config driven, deduplication, incremental, incremental backup and pruning.

autorestic runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 5 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

autorestic 1.8.3 builds and all 64 Go unit test assertions pass across cmd, internal, and lock packages. The binary responds to --help and --version.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.11 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
1,872
forks
99
open issues
103
watchers
11
size
3 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
5 minutes
Cold machine to finish
12 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
`go test -v ./...` exited 0, 3 test packages passed (17 test suites, 64 assertions). `./autorestic --help` printed all 12 commands. `./autorestic --version` printed 'autorestic version 1.8.3'.
Model tokens used
75,741
Exact commit tested
496a8cc3afbb
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

PASS
ok    github.com/cupcakearmy/autorestic/internal  (cached)
PASS
ok    github.com/cupcakearmy/autorestic/internal/lock  (cached)
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'export PATH="/home/runner/.local/share/mise/installs/go/1.27.1/bin:$PATH"; cd /work/re…
 succeeded in 0ms:
64
Here is the final result:
tokens used
75,741
Here is the final result:

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 5 minutes, faster than the median of the 15 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 16 backup projects Argusic has installed and timed, autorestic was the 4th fastest to reach a running state, and 12 of 16 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 5 minutes after the clone.
  • Following its own README: the documented path worked with nothing to fix.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.11

Topics (from GitHub)

backupcliconfigconfig-drivendeduplicationincrementalincremental-backuppruningrestic

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/autorestic.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/autorestic)

Questions

Does autorestic run?
Yes. autorestic runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 5 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test autorestic?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 496a8cc3afbb. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test autorestic?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.11: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does autorestic take to install?
5 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does autorestic need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing autorestic?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
How does autorestic compare with the alternatives?
Of the 16 backup projects Argusic has installed and timed, autorestic was the 4th fastest to reach a running state, and 12 of 16 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for autorestic?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion