ragflow

RAGFlow is a leading open-source Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) engine that fuses cutting-edge RAG with Agent capabilities to create a superior context layer for LLMs

Runssource: GitHubhomepageGoApache-2.0commit 313ca90f6abd

Go, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: agent harness, agentic ai, agentic nagive, agentic retrieval, agentic search, ai, ai agents and context engine.

ragflow runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 80 minutes and hit 7 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Python 3.13 venv with 697 deps installed, Go toolchain auto-resolved to go1.27, C++ librag_tokenizer_c_api.a built with clang++-20, Go binaries ragflow_server and ragflow-cli compiled successfully, Go unit tests pass (all packages), Python unit tests pass (5145/5145), frontend builds successfully, native static libs (pdfium/pdf_oxide/office_oxide/onnxruntime) linked.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.20 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
91,283
forks
10,823
open issues
1,511
watchers
362
size
169 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing ragflow, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Missing clang++ (required by build.sh)5 minutes
  • Missing libpcre2-8.a (required by C++ tokenizer static library)3 minutes
  • Missing ld.lld (required to link Chromium-built pdfium)2 minutes
  • Missing cmake >= 4.0 (CMakeLists.txt requires 4.0)2 minutes
  • Frontend build required node >= 20.19 (system had 18.19)2 minutes
  • Frontend build OOM with default Node heap1 minute
Install time
80 minutes
Cold machine to finish
40 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
7 hit, 7 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
Go unit tests: bash build.sh --test ./internal/tokenizer/... ./internal/cli/... ./internal/dao/... ./internal/storage/... ./internal/engine/... ./internal/parser/... ./internal/entity/... ./internal/server/... ./internal/router/... ./internal/handler/... ./internal/agent/... ./internal/service/... ./internal/ingestion/... all passed. Python unit tests: PYTHONPATH=$PWD .venv/bin/python3 -m pytest test/unit_test/ --no-header -q --ignore=test/unit_test/sdk --ignore=test/unit_test/agent/component returned 5145 passed, 26 skipped. CLI binary: bin/ragflow-cli --version returned 'RAGFlow CLI version 313ca90'. Frontend: npm run build completed in 3m19s.
Model tokens used
1,105,613
Exact commit tested
313ca90f6abd
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

exec
/bin/sh -lc 'echo "Start of session: repo files dated"; ls -la /work/repo/.git/index 2>/dev/null; e…
 succeeded in 0ms:
Start of session: repo files dated
-rw-rw-r-- 1 runner runner 733524 Sep 25 07:54 /work/repo/.git/index
Current time: 1790322925
Start estimate: roughly when log began
5
Now I have all the information I need. Let me construct the final report.
tokens used
1,105,613
Now I have all the information I need. Let me construct the final report.

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 80 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 7 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.20

Topics (from GitHub)

agent-harnessagentic-aiagentic-nagiveagentic-retrievalagentic-searchaiai-agentscontext-enginecontext-engineeringcontext-managementharness-engineeringknowledge-compilationragretrieval-augmented-generationsearch-harness

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/ragflow.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/ragflow)

Questions

Does ragflow run?
Yes. ragflow runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 80 minutes, hitting 7 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test ragflow?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 313ca90f6abd. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test ragflow?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.20: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does ragflow take to install?
80 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does ragflow need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing ragflow?
7 things broke in the recorded run, and 7 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for ragflow?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion