parlant

Build reliable customer-facing AI agents with Parlant: an interaction control harness optimized for controlled, consistent, and predictable LLM interactions.

Runs with mockssource: GitHubhomepagePythonApache-2.0commit ea737442b8ae

Python, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: ai agents, ai alignment, customer service, customer success, gemini, genai, hacktoberfest and llama3.

parlant runs, with stand-ins for the services it depends on. An Argusic agent installed it in 5 minutes and hit 3 errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Parlant v3.3.1 installs, imports, its server launches and responds on port 8800, and 113 of 115 non-engine tests pass when backed by the mock Emcie NLP server.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 85.3 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs with mocks
Argusic Score
85.3 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.17 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
18,290
forks
1,557
open issues
41
watchers
108
size
87 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing parlant, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Emcie API key required as default NLP service5 minutes
  • Missing chromadb module in prepare_migration.py at module level1 minute
  • parlant CLI (client) cannot import JourneyTriggerUpdateParams from installed parlant-client v3.2.0
Install time
5 minutes
Cold machine to finish
24 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 2 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
pytest test suite: 113 passed, 2 failed across 12 test files. Server: 'parlant-server run --port 8800' with OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-fake printed 'Server is ready for some serious action' and responded 307 on root URL.
Model tokens used
601,822
Exact commit tested
ea737442b8ae
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Behaviour against real services
this run was verified against stand-in services only

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

  - test_context_variables: 13/13
  Total: 113/115 passed (2 expected mock-limitation failures)
Issues discovered/fixed:
  - Missing chromadb (installed as fix)
  - parlant CLI has version mismatch with parlant-client package
  - Server requires OPENAI_API_KEY (real credential) or runs via parlant-server
2026-09-26T02:00:10.102987Z ERROR codex_core::session: failed to record rollout items: thread 01a0d…
2026-09-26T02:00:10.103033Z ERROR codex_core::session: failed to record rollout items: thread 01a0d…
2026-09-26T02:00:10.103058Z ERROR codex_core::session: failed to record rollout items: thread 01a0d…
2026-09-26T02:00:10.103067Z ERROR codex_core::session: failed to record rollout items: thread 01a0d…
tokens used
601,822

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Installed in 5 minutes.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Only reached a running state against stand-in services, so nothing here proves it works against the real ones.
  • Hit 3 errors during setup, 1 of which were not solved.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 20 ai-agents projects Argusic has installed and timed, parlant was the 10th fastest to reach a running state, and 12 of 20 reached one at all.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs with mocks85.330.17

Topics (from GitHub)

ai-agentsai-alignmentcustomer-servicecustomer-successgeminigenaihacktoberfestllama3llmopenaipython

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/parlant.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/parlant)

Questions

Does parlant run?
parlant runs, with mocks standing in for external services. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 5 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test parlant?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit ea737442b8ae. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test parlant?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.17: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does parlant take to install?
5 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does parlant need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing parlant?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 2 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does parlant compare with the alternatives?
Of the 20 ai-agents projects Argusic has installed and timed, parlant was the 10th fastest to reach a running state, and 12 of 20 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for parlant?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion