gitlogue

A cinematic Git commit replay tool for the terminal, turning your Git history into a living, animated story.

Runssource: GitHubRustISCcommit 73750f745249

Rust, ISC licensed. The project labels itself: cli, cli tool, code animation, commit history, developer tools, git, git history and git visualization.

gitlogue runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 8 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

The Rust Git history screensaver gitlogue builds, installs via cargo, passes all 228 tests (including integration tests that create real Git repos and run the CLI binary in pseudo-terminals), and prints its version and help correctly.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.02 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
4,994
forks
115
open issues
12
watchers
13
size
80 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
8 minutes
Cold machine to finish
5 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
cargo test exited 0, 228 passed (55 lib unit + 163 main unit + 10 integration); gitlogue --version returned 'gitlogue 0.11.0'; gitlogue --help printed all subcommands and options
Model tokens used
34,159
Exact commit tested
73750f745249
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

running 0 tests
test result: ok. 0 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
All systems green. Let me compile the final report.
**Install**: no errors. Rust wasn't present in the container — installed via rustup, then `cargo bu…
**Tests**: `cargo test` — 228 passed (55 unit in lib, 163 unit in main, 10 integration), 0 failed. …
**No mocks needed**: the project has no third-party API key dependencies. All tree-sitter grammars …
tokens used
34,159
All systems green. Let me compile the final report.
**Install**: no errors. Rust wasn't present in the container — installed via rustup, then `cargo bu…
**Tests**: `cargo test` — 228 passed (55 unit in lib, 163 unit in main, 10 integration), 0 failed. …
**No mocks needed**: the project has no third-party API key dependencies. All tree-sitter grammars …

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed ISC, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 8 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 24 comparable projects Argusic has measured.

Of the 25 cli projects Argusic has installed and timed, gitlogue was the 17th fastest to reach a running state, and 23 of 25 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 8 minutes after the clone.
  • Following its own README: the documented path worked with nothing to fix.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.02
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.13

Topics (from GitHub)

clicli-toolcode-animationcommit-historydeveloper-toolsgitgit-historygit-visualizationproductivityratatuirustscreensaversyntax-highlightingterminalterminal-appterminal-basedterminal-screensavertree-sittertuivisualization

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/gitlogue.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/gitlogue)

Questions

Does gitlogue run?
Yes. gitlogue runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 8 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test gitlogue?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 73750f745249. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test gitlogue?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.02: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does gitlogue take to install?
8 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does gitlogue need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing gitlogue?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
How does gitlogue compare with the alternatives?
Of the 25 cli projects Argusic has installed and timed, gitlogue was the 17th fastest to reach a running state, and 23 of 25 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for gitlogue?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion