DPP
C++ Discord API Bot Library - D++ is Lightweight and scalable for small and huge bots!
Not yet verifiedsource: GitHubhomepageC++Apache-2.0commit 786ceb2e24f2
C++, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: api, api client, api wrapper, cpp, discord, discord api, discord api v10 and discord api wrapper.
DPP has not been verified yet.
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 80 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the most recent recorded attempt, which did not reach a verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
What went wrong, in the agent's own words
The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.
- Missing zlib development headers and library symlink2 minutes
- Install time
- 7 minutes
- Cold machine to finish
- 8 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 1 hit, 1 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- cd /work/repo/build/library && LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/work/repo/build/library ./unittest -- exited 0, 64 passed, 0 failed, 108 skipped (offline mode)
- Model tokens used
- 47,775
- Exact commit tested
- 786ceb2e24f2
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
- Whether it works at all
- this run verified nothing, so this page makes no claim either way
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
D++ 10.1.7 (06-Aug-2026) Voice support not enabled in this build of D++ All tests passed. Let me compile the final report. Here's the summary of everything I did: **Build**: Configured with CMake (`-DDPP_NO_VCPKG=ON -DDPP_NO_CONAN=ON -DBUILD_VOICE_SUPPORT=OFF`),… **Tests**: Ran the `unittest` binary. 64 offline tests passed, 108 online tests skipped (no Discord… tokens used 47,775 All tests passed. Let me compile the final report. Here's the summary of everything I did: **Build**: Configured with CMake (`-DDPP_NO_VCPKG=ON -DDPP_NO_CONAN=ON -DBUILD_VOICE_SUPPORT=OFF`),… **Tests**: Ran the `unittest` binary. 64 offline tests passed, 108 online tests skipped (no Discord…
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Also tested, in the same area
Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.
Run history
| tested by | attempt | outcome | score | cost USD | when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argusic Runner | 1/3 | Unverified | 80.00 | 0.03 |
Topics (from GitHub)
apiapi-clientapi-wrappercppdiscorddiscord-apidiscord-api-v10discord-api-wrapperdiscord-botdockerdppetfhacktoberfestjsonlibrarylinuxosxsslwebsocketwindows
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/dpp)Questions
- Does DPP run?
- DPP has not been fully verified yet. No recorded run has produced a verdict yet.
- How did Argusic test DPP?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- Where is the evidence for DPP?
- The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.