dashi-taskboard

现代化可灵活嵌入的任务面板,支持 Codex、DeepSeek Harness

Runssource: GitHubJavaScriptApache-2.0commit 723c400eec86

JavaScript, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: claude code, cli, codex, codex app, codex desktop, codex plugin, dsh and dsh plugin.

dashi-taskboard runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 45 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

The Codex Taskboard server starts and answers HTTP 200 on port 47823, all 30 server tests and 9 component tests pass, the web UI builds via Vite, and the taskctl CLI prints its help. The server and build scripts need --experimental-sqlite passed to node, which is not in the current package.json scripts.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.02 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
3,359
forks
0
open issues
0
watchers
0
created
-
last push
-

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page. Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing dashi-taskboard, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • System Node.js 18.19.1 does not meet >=22.5 requirement3 minutes
  • Rollup native binding @rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu not installed as optional dependency2 minutes
  • node:sqlite built-in requires --experimental-sqlite flag2 minutes
Install time
45 minutes
Cold machine to finish
6 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
node --experimental-sqlite --test test/server.test.mjs → 30 passed, 0 failed; npx vitest run web/src/components/MarkdownDocument.test.tsx → 1 file passed 9 tests; curl http://127.0.0.1:47823/ → HTTP 200; GET /api/projects → valid JSON
Model tokens used
138,119
Exact commit tested
723c400eec86
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

1. **Node.js upgrade** – repo requires `>=22.5`; system had v18.19.1. Installed v22.5.0 via `n`, th…
2. **Missing native binding** – The Vite/Rolldown build failed because `@rolldown/binding-linux-x64…
3. **`node:sqlite` flag** – The server and tests use `import { DatabaseSync } from "node:sqlite"`, …
**Verification:**
- **Server** launched and answered `HTTP 200` on `http://127.0.0.1:47823/`
- **API** returns projects (`GET /api/projects` → valid JSON with default `local` project)
- **Server test suite**: `node --experimental-sqlite --test test/server.test.mjs` → **30 passed, 0 …
- **Component tests**: `npx vitest run web/src/components/MarkdownDocument.test.tsx` → **1 file pas…
- **TypeScript check**: `npm run typecheck` → exit 0
- **CLI**: `node cli/taskctl.mjs --help` prints all subcommands
- **Web build**: `npm run build:web` succeeds (the full `npm run build` fails at the post-build inj…
**Remaining gap:** `npm run build` and `npm start` need the `--experimental-sqlite` flag. The `npm …

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 45 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 7 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 8 claude-code projects Argusic has installed and timed, dashi-taskboard was the 8th fastest to reach a running state, and 7 of 8 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.02

Topics (from GitHub)

claude-codeclicodexcodex-appcodex-desktopcodex-plugindshdsh-pluginskills

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/dashi-taskboard.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/dashi-taskboard)

Questions

Does dashi-taskboard run?
Yes. dashi-taskboard runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 45 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test dashi-taskboard?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 723c400eec86. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test dashi-taskboard?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.02: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does dashi-taskboard take to install?
45 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does dashi-taskboard need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing dashi-taskboard?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does dashi-taskboard compare with the alternatives?
Of the 8 claude-code projects Argusic has installed and timed, dashi-taskboard was the 8th fastest to reach a running state, and 7 of 8 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for dashi-taskboard?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion