Argusic could not verify that voxelcore runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.

How did Argusic test voxelcore?

On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 16935fb5b92d. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.

What did it cost to test voxelcore?

The run that produced this verdict cost $0.75: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.

Does voxelcore need a GPU?

Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.

What goes wrong when installing voxelcore?

Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.

Where is the evidence for voxelcore?

All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

voxelcore

VoxelCore, voxel game engine in C++

Could not verifysource: GitHubC++MPL-2.0commit 16935fb5b92d

C++, MPL-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: game, game engine, opengl and voxel game.

Argusic could not get voxelcore running. An Argusic agent hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 20 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict: Could not verify
Argusic Score: 20 / 100
cost of the verifying run: $0.75 (measured)
recorded runs: 2
last tested: 2026-10-07
stars: 1,473
forks: 124
open issues: 68
watchers: 46
size: 47 MB
created: 2021-04-25
last push: 2026-10-06

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed 2026-10-07. Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Cold machine to finish: 69 minutes
Errors hit and fixed: 0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
Model tokens used: 1,356,903
Exact commit tested: 16935fb5b92d
Container image: sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Install time: the run did not report one
How the result was proved: runs before 2026-09-07 did not record the command used to check the result
Peak GPU memory: this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run: each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Whether it works at all: this run verified nothing, so this page makes no claim either way

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

cp /home/runner/x11-sysroot2/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*.so /home/runner/x11-sysroot/usr/lib/x86_64-…
cp /home/runner/x11-sysroot2/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/*.a /home/runner/x11-sysroot/usr/lib/x86_64-l…
# Verify
wc -c /home/runner/x11-sysroot/usr/include/X11/Xlib.h
grep "typedef.*Display" /home/runner/x11-sysroot/usr/include/X11/Xlib.h 2>/dev/null | head -3' in /…
 succeeded in 0ms:
99853 /home/runner/x11-sysroot/usr/include/X11/Xlib.h
typedef struct _XDisplay Display;
typedef union { Display *display;
tokens used
1,356,903
The issue is clear - the real `Xlib.h` from the `libx11-dev` deb was 99KB but my stub overwrote it.…

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
Licensed MPL-2.0, as reported by its host.
Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

An agent with no time limit did not get it running.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested by	attempt	outcome	score	cost USD	when
Argusic Runner	2/3	Did not run	20.00	0.75	2026-10-07 20:53 UTC
Argusic Runner	1/3	Did not run	20.00	0.30	2026-10-07 19:41 UTC

Topics (from GitHub)

game game-engine opengl voxel-game

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/voxelcore.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/voxelcore)

Questions

Does voxelcore run?: Argusic could not verify that voxelcore runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test voxelcore?: On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 16935fb5b92d. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test voxelcore?: The run that produced this verdict cost $0.75: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
Does voxelcore need a GPU?: Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing voxelcore?: Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
Where is the evidence for voxelcore?: All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.