librespot-python

Open Source Spotify Client

Runs with mockssource: GitHubhomepagePythonApache-2.0commit 683d9e76f91b

Python, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: hacktoberfest, librespot, librespot python, music streaming, python and roadmap.

librespot-python runs, with stand-ins for the services it depends on. An Argusic agent installed it in 24 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

librespot-python 0.0.10 installs, imports, and the Zeroconf HTTP server component starts on a TCP port and responds to getInfo requests.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 86 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs with mocks
Argusic Score
86 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.04 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
331
forks
87
open issues
24
watchers
7
size
1 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
24 minutes
Cold machine to finish
7 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
ZeroconfServer.Builder().set_device_type().set_device_name().set_listen_port(19996).create() started HTTP server; socket connected to 127.0.0.1:19996; GET /?action=getInfo sent; HTTP/1.0 response prefix received; server.close() completed
Model tokens used
191,316
Exact commit tested
683d9e76f91b
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Behaviour against real services
this run was verified against stand-in services only

Watch the session

The whole run, from a clean machine, at the speed it actually happened. Nothing is cut and nothing is sped up.

A recording of attempt 1, run , the attempt that decided the verdict above. The terminal recording it was made from is the evidence, stored with a sha256 fingerprint; the video is a rendering of it. Nothing loads from the video host until you press play.

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

\" 2>&1" in /work/repo
 succeeded in 149ms:
All README usage examples import without error
Library is fully installable and importable
Now I have all the data needed for the final
exec
/bin/sh -lc "# Quick sanity check on the unimportable protos to see if they affect runtime
/work/repo/venv/bin/python -c \"from librespot.core import Session; print('core imports ok')\" 2>&1…
 succeeded in 109ms:
core imports ok
tokens used
191,316

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Installed in 24 minutes.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • Only reached a running state against stand-in services, so nothing here proves it works against the real ones.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Unverified80.000.08
Argusic Runner1/3Runs with mocks92.000.04

Topics (from GitHub)

hacktoberfestlibrespotlibrespot-pythonmusic-streamingpythonroadmap

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/librespot-python.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/librespot-python)

Questions

Does librespot-python run?
librespot-python runs, with mocks standing in for external services. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 24 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test librespot-python?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 683d9e76f91b. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test librespot-python?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.04: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does librespot-python take to install?
24 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does librespot-python need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing librespot-python?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
Where is the evidence for librespot-python?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion