evennia

Python MUD/MUX/MUSH/MU* development system

Not yet verifiedsource: GitHubhomepagePythonBSD-3-Clausecommit a89a9b94e4d7

Python, BSD-3-Clause licensed. The project labels itself: based, django, engine, game development, game engine, gamedev, hacktoberfest and moo.

evennia has not been verified yet.

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence.

At a glance

verdict
Not yet verified
Argusic Score
not scored yet
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
2,110
forks
770
open issues
134
watchers
130
size
374 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the most recent recorded attempt, which did not reach a verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Migration 0017 uses get_operations() pattern never called by Django 5.1+
  • EvenniaLogFile accesses settings at class definition time
  • Twisted reactor conflicts when running multiple test modules in one process
Install time
2 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
evennia test passed: test_server (9), test_launcher (15), test_gametime (13), test_dbserialize (17), all OK
Model tokens used
317,893
Exact commit tested
a89a9b94e4d7
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Cold machine to finish
the attempt was stopped at the time limit after 95 minutes, so it never finished
Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

exec
/bin/sh -lc 'cd /work/repo/.isocheck && timeout 120 /home/runner/.local/bin/uv run evennia test eve…
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'cd /work/repo/.isocheck && timeout 120 /home/runner/.local/bin/uv run evennia test eve…
 succeeded in 51362ms:
Ran 1 test in 10.243s
OK
Destroying test database for alias 'default'...
    TESTING: Using Evennia's default settings file (evennia.settings_default).
    (use 'evennia test --settings settings.py .' to run only your custom game tests)
Found 1 test(s).
System check identified no issues (0 silenced).

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Ran out of time0.000.65

Topics (from GitHub)

baseddjangoenginegame-developmentgame-enginegamedevhacktoberfestmoomudmultiplayermushmuxpythontexttext-basedtext-based-adventuretwistedwebclientwebserver

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/evennia.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/evennia)

Questions

Does evennia run?
evennia has not been fully verified yet. No recorded run has produced a verdict yet.
How did Argusic test evennia?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
Where is the evidence for evennia?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion