cyberapi

API tool based on tauri, it is smaller and faster.

Runssource: GitHubRustApache-2.0commit 5b959b8f33d8

Rust, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: api, api client, rest api and tauri.

cyberapi runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 38 minutes and hit 5 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

The cyberapi desktop app builds, all 198 workspace tests pass, and a fresh launch on the virtual display stays up with a live 'Cyber API' 1280x800 window while creating a valid 10-table cyberapi.db, after a one-line src/lib.rs fix that creates the data directory on first launch.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.52 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
421
forks
37
open issues
11
watchers
3
size
11 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing cyberapi, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • first launch showed startup-error window and wrote no DB: data dir parent absent and turso does not create it14 minutes
  • disk filled (40G) by two full build+test passes; sqlx bridge test build failed with No space left on device8 minutes
  • yeslogic-fontconfig-sys build failed: no fontconfig dev headers/.pc to compile bindings6 minutes
  • linker: unable to find -lxkbcommon, -lxkbcommon-x11, -lxcb (runtime .so.0s present, no dev symlinks, no root for apt)4 minutes
  • cargo test: this_build::tests::the_desktop_reads_files panicked on missing Downloads/XDG user dirs in container3 minutes
Install time
38 minutes
Cold machine to finish
67 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
5 hit, 5 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
RUST_FONTCONFIG_DLOPEN=1 RUSTFLAGS="-L /tmp/liblinks" cargo test --all exited 0 with 198 passed 0 failed 2 ignored; timeout 20 ./target/debug/cyberapi with CYBERAPI_DATA_DIR=/tmp/final-run stayed alive, xwininfo showed window 0x200001 'Cyber API' 1280x800, and sqlite3 decode of the created cyberapi.db listed 10 tables (api_collections, api_folders, api_settings, cookies, cyberapi_meta, prefs, responses, top_orders, variables, versions)
Model tokens used
1,931,689
Exact commit tested
5b959b8f33d8
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

- Built the workspace and ran the full test suite; diagnosed and worked around missing system dev l…
- Found and fixed a first-launch bug (data dir was never created); after the one-line fix a brand-n…
**Errors hit and fixes**
- `yeslogic-fontconfig-sys` build failed (no `fontconfig.pc`/headers): used that crate's built-in `…
- Link failed on `-lxkbcommon`, `-lxkbcommon-x11`, `-lxcb` (runtime `.so.0` present, no dev symlink…
- One test (`the_desktop_reads_files`) panicked on `x.json` because no `~/.config/user-dirs.dirs` (…
- First launch showed a startup-error window and wrote no database because the parent data dir was …
- Disk filled (40G) from two full build/test passes: cleaned with `cargo clean` and re-ran everythi…
**Final verification**
- `RUST_FONTCONFIG_DLOPEN=1 RUSTFLAGS="-L /tmp/liblinks" cargo test --all` → `passed=198 failed=0 i…
- Fresh launch `timeout 20 ./target/debug/cyberapi` with `CYBERAPI_DATA_DIR=/tmp/final-run` → proce…
- Bridge (`cyberapi-bridge --help` works; connecting to PostgreSQL requires a DB server not present…

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 5 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 38 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 46 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 47 api projects Argusic has installed and timed, cyberapi was the 47th fastest to reach a running state, and 30 of 47 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.52

Topics (from GitHub)

apiapi-clientrest-apitauri

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/cyberapi.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/cyberapi)

Questions

Does cyberapi run?
Yes. cyberapi runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 38 minutes, hitting 5 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test cyberapi?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 5b959b8f33d8. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test cyberapi?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.52: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does cyberapi take to install?
38 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does cyberapi need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing cyberapi?
5 things broke in the recorded run, and 5 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does cyberapi compare with the alternatives?
Of the 47 api projects Argusic has installed and timed, cyberapi was the 47th fastest to reach a running state, and 30 of 47 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for cyberapi?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion