boss-agent-cli

🤖 Local-assist BOSS Zhipin CLI for AI agents, search, welfare filtering, shortlist, JSON-envelope output; low-risk & compliant by default.

Runs with mockssource: GitHubhomepagePythonMITcommit cf38175d11a1

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: agent skill, agent tools, ai agent, boss zhipin, claude, cli, command line and job hunting.

boss-agent-cli runs, with stand-ins for the services it depends on. An Argusic agent installed it in 6 minutes and hit 2 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

The project installs and builds under uv, the whole offline test suite passes 2084/2084, ruff and mypy pass, the boss CLI and the MCP server start and answer, and the CLI's status, detail, search, welfare-filter and wizard commands return correct ok:true JSON envelopes against a local mock of the zhipin API that mirrors the repo's own documented response schema.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 92 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs with mocks
Argusic Score
92 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.34 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
2,042
forks
171
open issues
3
watchers
2
size
43 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing boss-agent-cli, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Fresh environment had no uv; `pip install uv` then `uv sync --all-extras` installed all deps cleanly, but the plain README flow ran into an unrelated missing-dependency problem at the installed entry point: `boss-mcp --help` failed with `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mcp'`.2 minutes
  • Patchright chromium was missing, so `doctor` warned and browser-channel commands fail.1 minute
Install time
6 minutes
Cold machine to finish
14 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
2 hit, 2 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
uv run pytest tests/ -q: 2084 passed; uv run ruff check src/ tests/: All checks passed; uv run mypy src/boss_agent_cli: Success (161 files); uv run boss --version: boss, version 2.0.0; uv run boss schema --format native / uv run boss doctor: JSON envelope with ok:true; boss-mcp --help: usage printed; against a schema-correct mock, CLI status/detail/search/wizard commands returned ok:true with expected data.
Model tokens used
1,730,084
Exact commit tested
cf38175d11a1
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Behaviour against real services
this run was verified against stand-in services only

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

    await server.run(read_stream, write_stream, server.create_initialization_options())
def _normalize_path(path: str) -> str:
  if not path.startswith("/"):
    return f"/{path}"
  return path
Now I have all the information needed. Let me compile the final result.
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'rg -c "''^from boss_agent_cli|''^import boss_agent_cli" /tmp/mockboss/sitecustomize.py…
 succeeded in 0ms:
6
tokens used
1,730,084

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Recovered from all 2 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Only reached a running state against stand-in services, so nothing here proves it works against the real ones.
  • Took 6 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 3 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 4 agent-skill projects Argusic has installed and timed, boss-agent-cli was the 4th fastest to reach a running state, and 2 of 4 reached one at all.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs with mocks92.000.34

Topics (from GitHub)

agent-skillagent-toolsai-agentboss-zhipinclaudeclicommand-linejob-huntingjob-searchmcpmodel-context-protocolpythonrecruiter-workflowrecruitmentresumezhipin

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/boss-agent-cli.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/boss-agent-cli)

Questions

Does boss-agent-cli run?
boss-agent-cli runs, with mocks standing in for external services. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 6 minutes, hitting 2 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test boss-agent-cli?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit cf38175d11a1. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test boss-agent-cli?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.34: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does boss-agent-cli take to install?
6 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does boss-agent-cli need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing boss-agent-cli?
2 things broke in the recorded run, and 2 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does boss-agent-cli compare with the alternatives?
Of the 4 agent-skill projects Argusic has installed and timed, boss-agent-cli was the 4th fastest to reach a running state, and 2 of 4 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for boss-agent-cli?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion