vscode-restclient

REST Client Extension for Visual Studio Code

Could not verifysource: GitHubhomepageTypeScriptMITcommit 0773d56b65d9

TypeScript, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: graphql, http, http client, rest, rest api, rest client, typescript and visual studio code.

Argusic could not get vscode-restclient running. An Argusic agent installed it in 10 minutes and hit 1 error and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

REST Client VSCode extension installs dependencies, type-checks via tslint with zero errors, and builds successfully in both development (14.6 MiB) and production (4.57 MiB, minified) webpack configurations; the extension requires VSCode to activate and run.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 65 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Could not verify
Argusic Score
65 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.05 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
6,051
forks
540
open issues
593
watchers
62
size
10 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing vscode-restclient, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • npx webpack --mode production (vscode:prepublish) repeatedly timed out after 30s due to TerserPlugin minification on large bundle5 minutes
Install time
10 minutes
Cold machine to finish
12 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
1 hit, 1 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
npm run vscode:prepublish exited 0 (production bundle at dist/extension.js, 4.57 MiB, minified); npm run tslint exited 0 (0 lint errors); npm run webpack (dev) also exited 0
Model tokens used
56,042
Exact commit tested
0773d56b65d9
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Whether it works at all
this run verified nothing, so this page makes no claim either way

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

 succeeded in 0ms:
-rw-rw-r-- 1 runner runner 4.6M Sep 29 05:03 /work/repo/dist/extension.js
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'npm run tslint 2>&1; echo "EXIT: $?"' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 1942ms:
> [email protected] tslint
> tslint --project tsconfig.json
EXIT: 0
All done. Let me compile the final result.
tokens used
56,042
All done. Let me compile the final result.

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Installed in 10 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 1 error without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • An agent with no time limit did not get it running.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Unverified80.000.05
Argusic Runner1/3Did not run50.000.04

Topics (from GitHub)

graphqlhttphttp-clientrestrest-apirest-clienttypescriptvisual-studio-codevscodevscode-extension

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/vscode-restclient.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/vscode-restclient)

Questions

Does vscode-restclient run?
Argusic could not verify that vscode-restclient runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 10 minutes, hitting 1 error on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test vscode-restclient?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 0773d56b65d9. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test vscode-restclient?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.05: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does vscode-restclient take to install?
10 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does vscode-restclient need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing vscode-restclient?
1 thing broke in the recorded run, and 1 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for vscode-restclient?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion