uilayouts
UI Layouts isn’t just a library. It’s your complete front-end universe with components, effects, design tools, and ready-to-use blocks, everything you need to build modern interfaces, faster.
Runssource: GitHubhomepageTypeScriptMITcommit 88d827d7ec34
TypeScript, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: accertinity, accordion component, animated tabs, codehike, component library, components, components react and drawer.
uilayouts runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 14 minutes and hit 4 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
Dependencies install and package tsc builds succeed; Next.js dev server compiles and serves the homepage at localhost:3457 with HTTP 200, though production build fails with OOM during static page generation
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 95 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
What went wrong, in the agent's own words
The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.
- @repo/shadcn build failed: missing radix-ui package, @/hooks/use-mobile not found, @/components/website/ui/label not found5 minutes
- @repo/ui build failed: tsconfig paths @/lib/*, @/components/*, @/hooks/* pointed outside rootDir3 minutes
- Next.js build failed: @tailwindcss/oxide native binding not installed for linux-x64-gnu3 minutes
- Next.js build OOM during 'Collecting page data' phase (exit code 137)2 minutes
- Install time
- 14 minutes
- Cold machine to finish
- 32 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 4 hit, 4 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- pnpm install completed with all 8 workspace packages; @repo/ui and @repo/shadcn tsc builds pass; Next.js dev server started and returned HTTP 200 on GET / after compiling 9600 modules in 33.7s
- Model tokens used
- 525,395
- Exact commit tested
- 88d827d7ec34
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
@radix-ui/react-label 2.1.11 @radix-ui/react-navigation-menu 1.2.17 @radix-ui/react-popover 1.1.18 @radix-ui/react-scroll-area 1.2.13 The project is working. Let me finalize with the ARGUSIC_RESULT JSON: exec /bin/sh -lc 'kill $(lsof -t -i:3457) 2>/dev/null; echo "cleaned up"' in /work/repo succeeded in 0ms: /bin/sh: 1: lsof: not found cleaned up tokens used 525,395
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Installed in 14 minutes.
- Recovered from all 4 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
- Measured 4 times, so the result is not a one-off.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
Also tested, in the same area
Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.
Run history
Topics (from GitHub)
accertinityaccordion-componentanimated-tabscodehikecomponent-librarycomponentscomponents-reactdrawerframer-motionimage-mousetrailmodalmouse-animationmousetrailreactreact-animation-componentsshadcnshadcnuisparklesspotlighttailwindcss
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/uilayouts)Questions
- Does uilayouts run?
- Yes. uilayouts runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 14 minutes, hitting 4 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test uilayouts?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 88d827d7ec34. 4 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test uilayouts?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.23: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does uilayouts take to install?
- 14 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does uilayouts need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing uilayouts?
- 4 things broke in the recorded run, and 4 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
- Where is the evidence for uilayouts?
- All 4 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.