tunwg

Secure private tunnel to your local servers

Not yet testedsource: GitHubhomepageGoMITcommit 51f78dd9828d

Go, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: ngrok alternative, self hosted, tunnel, wireguard and wireguard tunnel.

tunwg has not been verified yet.

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence.

At a glance

verdict
Not yet tested
Argusic Score
not scored yet
recorded runs
0
last tested
-
stars
287
forks
22
open issues
3
watchers
8
size
0 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

  • wstunnel verified to run · Rust · 2 shared topics
  • wireproxy verified to run · Go · 2 shared topics
  • wireguard-docs verified to run · Shell · 2 shared topics
  • proxy.py verified to run · Python · 2 shared topics
  • tsdproxy tested, not verified · Go · 2 shared topics
  • wiredoor tested, not verified · TypeScript · 2 shared topics

Run history

No recorded runs.

Topics (from GitHub)

ngrok-alternativeself-hostedtunnelwireguardwireguard-tunnel

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/tunwg.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/tunwg)

Questions

Does tunwg run?
tunwg has not been fully verified yet. No recorded run has produced a verdict yet.
How did Argusic test tunwg?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded. 0 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
Where is the evidence for tunwg?
All 0 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion