songloft

🎵 插件化、无广告的免费音乐服务器

Runssource: GitHubhomepageGoApache-2.0commit e7807ff96554

Go, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: docker, docker compose, home server, miot, music, music player, music server and nas.

songloft runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 12 minutes and hit 1 error and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

The Go backend builds (make build-lite produces a working binary), starts with all 37 database migrations applied, serves GET /api/v1/health with 200, authenticates POST /api/v1/auth/login with admin/admin, and all 14 internal package unit tests pass. The root package test fails due to missing Flutter web assets (expected without Flutter SDK).

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.07 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
1,788
forks
144
open issues
18
watchers
7
size
27 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing songloft, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • pkg/tag submodule not initialized; go build failed with 'reading pkg/tag/go.mod: no such file or directory'2 minutes
Install time
12 minutes
Cold machine to finish
16 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
1 hit, 1 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
curl http://127.0.0.1:58192/api/v1/health returned 200 '{"status":"ok"}' AND curl POST /api/v1/auth/login with admin/admin returned 200 AND make test-unit passed: 14 packages OK, 0 failures
Model tokens used
64,336
Exact commit tested
e7807ff96554
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

Watch the session

The whole run, from a clean machine, at the speed it actually happened. Nothing is cut and nothing is sped up.

A recording of attempt 1, run . The verdict above comes from a different attempt, so read this as one session and not as the current result. The terminal recording it was made from is the evidence, stored with a sha256 fingerprint; the video is a rendering of it. Nothing loads from the video host until you press play.

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

- **Built successfully** — `make build-lite` produced a 34MB `songloft` binary with no errors
- **Launched and verified** — server started on port 58192, responded `200 {"status":"ok"}` on `/ap…
- **All unit tests pass** — `make test-unit` passed on all 14 internal packages (`internal/app`, `i…
tokens used
64,336
Everything works. Let me compile the final result.
Summary of work done:
- **Installed Go 1.26** — downloaded and extracted to `/home/runner/go`
- **Fixed missing submodule** — `pkg/tag` was empty; ran `git submodule update --init pkg/tag` to c…
- **Built successfully** — `make build-lite` produced a 34MB `songloft` binary with no errors
- **Launched and verified** — server started on port 58192, responded `200 {"status":"ok"}` on `/ap…
- **All unit tests pass** — `make test-unit` passed on all 14 internal packages (`internal/app`, `i…

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 1 error without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 12 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 8 comparable projects Argusic has measured.

Of the 9 docker projects Argusic has installed and timed, songloft was the 7th fastest to reach a running state, and 8 of 9 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.07
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.07

Topics (from GitHub)

dockerdocker-composehome-servermiotmusicmusic-playermusic-servernasnavidromesongloftsubsonicwebdavxiaomusic

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/songloft.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/songloft)

Questions

Does songloft run?
Yes. songloft runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 12 minutes, hitting 1 error on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test songloft?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit e7807ff96554. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test songloft?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.07: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does songloft take to install?
12 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does songloft need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing songloft?
1 thing broke in the recorded run, and 1 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does songloft compare with the alternatives?
Of the 9 docker projects Argusic has installed and timed, songloft was the 7th fastest to reach a running state, and 8 of 9 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for songloft?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion