pwd.sh
Manage secrets with Bash and GnuPG symmetric encryption
Runssource: GitHubhomepageShellMITcommit 7a5fd09010a0
Shell, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: bash, bash script, cryptography, encryption, file encryption, gnupg, gpg and password.
pwd.sh runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 17 minutes and hit 4 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
pwd.sh v4 works: write, list, read, generate-secret, generate-username (with PWDSH_DICT), backup, version, and help all function. Secrets encrypt via gpg symmetric AES256 and decrypt correctly.
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
What went wrong, in the agent's own words
The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.
- GnuPG (gpg binary) not installed in container5 minutes
- gpg-agent not found at /usr/bin/gpg-agent (compile-time path)2 minutes
- No /usr/share/dict/words - username generation fails1 minute
- tr: write error: Broken pipe during write (cosmetic)
- Install time
- 17 minutes
- Cold machine to finish
- 17 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 4 hit, 4 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- End-to-end test: wrote a secret for testUser (./pwd.sh w testUser 20), listed it (./pwd.sh l), read it back (./pwd.sh r testUser) returning the 20-char secret 'HjFh'azVOlG)1duBsPJV', verified gpg can decrypt files directly, and backup archive creates valid tar
- Model tokens used
- 137,191
- Exact commit tested
- 7a5fd09010a0
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
2. Downloaded gpg-agent, dirmngr, and gnupg-utils for full GnuPG support 3. Set up GPG with a key and gpg.conf pointing to the agent binary 4. PATH set to find gpg, gpg-agent, etc. **Functions verified:** - `./pwd.sh h` - help - `./pwd.sh v` - version - `./pwd.sh w testUser 20` - write (via PTY for password) - `./pwd.sh l` - list - `./pwd.sh r testUser` - read (via PTY) - `./pwd.sh s 30` - generate secret - `./pwd.sh u` - generate username (needs dictionary file) - `./pwd.sh b` - backup
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Recovered from all 4 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
What did not, or is not known
- Took 17 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 4 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
- Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.
Of the 5 bash projects Argusic has installed and timed, pwd.sh was the 5th fastest to reach a running state, and 4 of 5 reached one at all.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
Also tested, in the same area
Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.
Run history
Topics (from GitHub)
bashbash-scriptcryptographyencryptionfile-encryptiongnupggpgpasswordpassword-managersecretssecrets-managementsecurityunix
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/pwd-sh)Questions
- Does pwd.sh run?
- Yes. pwd.sh runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 17 minutes, hitting 4 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test pwd.sh?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 7a5fd09010a0. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test pwd.sh?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.10: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does pwd.sh take to install?
- 17 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does pwd.sh need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing pwd.sh?
- 4 things broke in the recorded run, and 4 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
- How does pwd.sh compare with the alternatives?
- Of the 5 bash projects Argusic has installed and timed, pwd.sh was the 5th fastest to reach a running state, and 4 of 5 reached one at all.
- Where is the evidence for pwd.sh?
- The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.