PharosRAG

Pharos, local-first agentic RAG for your team's document library: multi-format ingest, hybrid retrieval, enterprise ACL, dual HTTP + MCP exits.

Runs with mockssource: GitHubPythonMITcommit 162c7ca3e975

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: agentic rag, embeddings, fastapi, hybrid search, knowledge base, llm, local first and mcp.

PharosRAG runs, with stand-ins for the services it depends on. An Argusic agent installed it in 0.2 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Pharos installs, builds, and runs its test suite (240/240 pass in the product+engine CPU tests); the HTTP server starts and answers health checks; the MCP stdio adapter initializes with full tool contract; the RAG pipeline (embedder → Qdrant in-memory → hybrid dense+BM25 retrieval → small-to-big context assembly) works end-to-end via a mock inference backend;

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 92 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs with mocks
Argusic Score
92 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.09 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
243
forks
1
open issues
0
watchers
0
size
1 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing PharosRAG, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • pharos serve requires GPU model scripts at ~/models/Qwen3-VL-Embedding-8B/scripts which don't exist (no GPU in container)3 minutes
  • remote module _verify_server checks that os.path.basename(dense_model_path) matches the server's model_dense field, so default path basename ~/models/... must match2 minutes
  • externally-managed-environment prevents system-wide pip install0.2 minutes
Install time
under a minute
Cold machine to finish
22 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
`python -m pytest tests -q` exited 0 with 240 passed, 12 skipped (12 skipped because no torch installed; expected without [gpu] extra); `pharos health` returned {"status":"ok"} on running server; `curl http://127.0.0.1:8788/healthz` returned 200; `echo initialize | pharos mcp` returned valid MCP capabilities; `python -c '...embedder pipeline...'` indexed one doc and retrieved 1 hit with score=1.0; `curl -X POST /v1/ask` returned structured `llm_unconfigured` (correct, needs real DeepSeek key)
Model tokens used
268,489
Exact commit tested
162c7ca3e975
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Behaviour against real services
this run was verified against stand-in services only

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

All systems verified. Let me compile the final report.
**Install elapsed**: roughly 0.2 minutes (the pip install itself).
**Total time including investigation**: harder to bound, but within the allowed
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'pkill -f "mock_inference" 2>/dev/null; pkill -f "pharos serve" 2>/dev/null; echo "clea…
 exited 143 in 0ms:
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'date +%s' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 0ms:
1789889871
tokens used
268,489

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Installed in 0.2 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • Only reached a running state against stand-in services, so nothing here proves it works against the real ones.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Runs with mocks92.000.09
Argusic Runner1/3Runs with mocks92.000.03

Topics (from GitHub)

agentic-ragembeddingsfastapihybrid-searchknowledge-basellmlocal-firstmcpmodel-context-protocolpythonqdrantragretrieval-augmented-generationself-hosted

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/PharosRAG.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/pharosrag)

Questions

Does PharosRAG run?
PharosRAG runs, with mocks standing in for external services. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 0 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test PharosRAG?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 162c7ca3e975. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test PharosRAG?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.09: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does PharosRAG take to install?
0.2 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does PharosRAG need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing PharosRAG?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for PharosRAG?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion