odd-platform

First open-source data discovery and observability platform. We make a life for data practitioners easy so you can focus on your business.

Runssource: GitHubhomepageJavaApache-2.0commit 015f6fa2dac9

Java, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: alerting, bigdata, data catalog, data discovery, data engineering, data exploration, data governance and data lineage.

odd-platform runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 23 minutes and hit 8 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

ODD Platform backend compiles, starts, and serves HTTP 200 on /actuator/health with local PostgreSQL; 294 JOOQ classes and 367 API contract classes generated; frontend builds with 705 API client files; 645/962 backend tests pass (317 Docker-dependent skipped), 372/384 frontend tests pass.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.35 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
1,435
forks
151
open issues
145
watchers
19
size
31 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing odd-platform, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • PostgreSQL not installed; needed for both JOOQ codegen and runtime5 minutes
  • Java 17 (JDK) not found in the container3 minutes
  • Docker not available — JOOQ codegen (jooqDockerGenerate task) uses Testcontainers which needs Docker2 minutes
  • Node.js 24+ required by frontend but only v18.19.1 was available2 minutes
  • Frontend generate.sh uses Docker to run openapi-generator-cli2 minutes
  • pnpm (required by frontend) not found, npm install -g failed due to permissions1 minute
Install time
23 minutes
Cold machine to finish
24 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
8 hit, 8 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
curl -s http://localhost:8080/actuator/health returned HTTP 200 with body '{"status":"UP"}'
Model tokens used
233,058
Exact commit tested
015f6fa2dac9
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

2026-10-07T22:39:54.319Z  INFO 5055 --- [           main] o.s.b.web.embedded.netty.NettyWebServer  …
2026-10-07T22:39:54.402Z  INFO 5055 --- [           main] o.o.oddplatform.ODDPlatformApplication   …
2026-10-07T22:39:54.408Z  WARN 5055 --- [           main] o.s.core.events.SpringDocAppInitializer  …
2026-10-07T22:39:54.409Z  WARN 5055 --- [           main] o.s.core.events.SpringDocAppInitializer  …
VERIFIED: 200 on /actuator/health
BODY: {"status":"UP"}
2026-10-07T22:39:56.731Z  INFO 5055 --- [ionShutdownHook] o.s.b.w.embedded.netty.GracefulShutdown  …
2026-10-07T22:39:56.733Z  INFO 5055 --- [ netty-shutdown] o.s.b.w.embedded.netty.GracefulShutdown  …
Alright, I have all the data. Here's the final report.
tokens used
233,058
Alright, I have all the data. Here's the final report.

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 8 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 23 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 5 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 6 alerting projects Argusic has installed and timed, odd-platform was the 6th fastest to reach a running state, and 4 of 6 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.35

Topics (from GitHub)

alertingbigdatadata-catalogdata-discoverydata-engineeringdata-explorationdata-governancedata-lineagedata-observabilitydata-pipelinesdata-platformdata-profilingdata-qualitydata-sciencedatacataloglineagemetadatametadata-managementobservabilityoss

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/odd-platform.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/odd-platform)

Questions

Does odd-platform run?
Yes. odd-platform runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 23 minutes, hitting 8 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test odd-platform?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 015f6fa2dac9. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test odd-platform?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.35: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does odd-platform take to install?
23 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does odd-platform need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing odd-platform?
8 things broke in the recorded run, and 8 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does odd-platform compare with the alternatives?
Of the 6 alerting projects Argusic has installed and timed, odd-platform was the 6th fastest to reach a running state, and 4 of 6 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for odd-platform?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion