gsd-core

Git. Ship. Done - Core

Runssource: GitHubhomepageJavaScriptMITcommit 84ed9b843d9c

JavaScript, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: claude code, context engineering, meta prompting and spec driven development.

gsd-core runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 35 minutes and hit 1 error and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

GSD Core v1.15.0 builds, installs, and passes 841 unit tests with 0 failures on Node v24.21.0.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.06 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
9,883
forks
709
open issues
170
watchers
44
size
72 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing gsd-core, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • System Node.js v18.19.1 did not meet requirement Node >=24.0.02 minutes
Install time
35 minutes
Cold machine to finish
35 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
1 hit, 1 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
npm test:unit on 6 representative test files (active-workstream-store, adr-parser, frontmatter, model-catalog, platform-guard, state-contract) exited 0, 841 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped. node bin/install.js --help printed usage banner and all options. node gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs --help listed 130+ commands.
Model tokens used
259,947
Exact commit tested
84ed9b843d9c
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

exec
/bin/sh -lc 'echo $(( $(date +%s) - 1790525749 ))' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 0ms:
2092
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'echo $(( $(date +%s) - 1790525749 ))' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 0ms:
2097
Here is the final result:
tokens used
259,947
Here is the final result:

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 35 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 1 error without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.06

Topics (from GitHub)

claude-codecontext-engineeringmeta-promptingspec-driven-development

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/gsd-core.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/gsd-core)

Questions

Does gsd-core run?
Yes. gsd-core runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 35 minutes, hitting 1 error on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test gsd-core?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 84ed9b843d9c. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test gsd-core?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.06: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does gsd-core take to install?
35 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does gsd-core need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing gsd-core?
1 thing broke in the recorded run, and 1 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for gsd-core?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion