goaccess

GoAccess is a real-time web log analyzer and interactive viewer that runs in a terminal in *nix systems or through your browser.

Runssource: GitHubhomepageCMITcommit 5e6a1e4e1976

C, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: analytics, apache, caddy, cli, command line, dashboard, data analysis and gdpr.

goaccess runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 10 minutes and hit 2 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

GoAccess v1.11 builds from source and runs. It parses Apache/Nginx Combined log format files into valid JSON output with correct request counts (4 requests, 3 unique visitors, 2xx status codes, browser/user-agent breakdown) and generates a complete self-contained HTML report. The binary at /work/repo/goaccess executes under custom LD_LIBRARY_PATH for the extracted ncurses libraries.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.09 (measured)
recorded runs
3
last tested
stars
20,944
forks
1,193
open issues
449
watchers
300
size
10 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing goaccess, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Missing ncurses development headers and shared libraries (libncurses-dev, libncurses6, libtinfo6)4 minutes
  • Missing build toolchain (autoconf, automake, autopoint, gettext, m4) — the git checkout lacks the pre-generated configure script3 minutes
Install time
10 minutes
Cold machine to finish
14 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
2 hit, 2 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=<custom> ./goaccess -f test.log --log-format=COMBINED -o json | python3 -c validated JSON with correct metrics: total_requests=4, unique_visitors=3, valid_requests=4, bandwidth=5936. Also generated 1.9MB HTML report, and --version printed 'GoAccess - 1.11'
Model tokens used
87,087
Exact commit tested
5e6a1e4e1976
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

 succeeded in 0ms:
Build completed at: 1790072970
Start was around: 1790072370
install_minutes estimate: 10
Now let me copy the binary to the repo so we have a usable build in-place
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'cp /tmp/goaccess-src/goaccess /work/repo/goaccess' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 0ms:
Here's my full report:
tokens used
87,087
Here's my full report:

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 10 minutes, faster than the median of the 12 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Recovered from all 2 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 3 times, so the result is not a one-off.

Of the 13 analytics projects Argusic has installed and timed, goaccess was the 3rd fastest to reach a running state, and 10 of 13 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 10 minutes after the clone.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner3/3Runs100.000.09
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.26
Argusic Runner1/3Ran out of time0.000.36

Topics (from GitHub)

analyticsapacheccaddyclicommand-linedashboarddata-analysisgdprgoaccessgoogle-analyticsmonitoringncursesnginxprivacyreal-timeterminaltuiweb-analyticswebserver

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/goaccess.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/goaccess)

Questions

Does goaccess run?
Yes. goaccess runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 10 minutes, hitting 2 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test goaccess?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 5e6a1e4e1976. 3 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test goaccess?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.09: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does goaccess take to install?
10 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does goaccess need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing goaccess?
2 things broke in the recorded run, and 2 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does goaccess compare with the alternatives?
Of the 13 analytics projects Argusic has installed and timed, goaccess was the 3rd fastest to reach a running state, and 10 of 13 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for goaccess?
All 3 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion