EcomGen

Local-first AI e-commerce image suite generator for individual sellers. Pi Agent storyboards, 25 templates + reusable suites, product-truth pixel protection, OpenAI-compatible & Gemini image providers, AI layering (PNG/PSD), review, edit, and ZIP export. Self-hosted.

Runssource: GitHubTypeScriptMITcommit 894e7fb62d50

TypeScript, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: ai agent, ai image generation, bullmq, ecommerce, fastify, gemini, image editing and local first.

EcomGen runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 14.1 minutes and hit 4 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

All 11 workspace packages build successfully. Redis 7.4.2 compiled and serves on 127.0.0.1:6379. The API starts and responds 200 on /health. All 615 tests pass (79 test files), and the e2e mock chain (plan-confirm-generate-export-custom template-suite forge-model cast-pattern operations-cancel) passes end-to-end.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.15 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
237
forks
0
open issues
0
watchers
0
created
-
last push
-

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page. Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing EcomGen, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Redis not installed on system (no apt/sudo access)2.5 minutes
  • System Node.js v18 - pnpm@11 requires Node 22.13+2 minutes
  • sharp native module not loaded - install script skipped because sharp (and its @img/* optional deps) not in pnpm-workspace.yaml allowBuilds list1 minute
  • Build failed on packages/ecom-suite-forge - Node 18 doesn't support import.meta.dirname0.5 minutes
Install time
14 minutes
Cold machine to finish
14 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
4 hit, 4 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
pnpm build (11 workspace packages) completed; all 615 tests passed across 9 packages (contracts 20, core 63, ecom-suite 6, ecom-skill 48, providers 63, agent 61, api 91, worker 85, web 178); pnpm test:e2e:mock passed full mock chain; API server health endpoint at /health returned HTTP 200 with {"status":"ok","webResearchAvailable":false}
Model tokens used
305,340
Exact commit tested
894e7fb62d50
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

Watch the session

The whole run, from a clean machine, at the speed it actually happened. Nothing is cut and nothing is sped up.

A recording of attempt 1, run , the attempt that decided the verdict above. The terminal recording it was made from is the evidence, stored with a sha256 fingerprint; the video is a rendering of it. Nothing loads from the video host until you press play.

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

1794046988
exec
/bin/sh -lc '# First command was around timestamp 1794046140 (10:09:00 UTC)
echo "First command: 1794046140"
echo "Current:       1794046988"
echo "Elapsed: $((1794046988 - 1794046140)) seconds = $(( (1794046988 - 1794046140) / 60 )) min $((…
 succeeded in 0ms:
First command: 1794046140
Current:       1794046988
Elapsed: 848 seconds = 14 min 8 sec
tokens used
305,340

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 4 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 14.1 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 74 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 75 ai-agent projects Argusic has installed and timed, EcomGen was the 58th fastest to reach a running state, and 48 of 75 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.15

Topics (from GitHub)

ai-agentai-image-generationbullmqecommercefastifygeminiimage-editinglocal-firstnano-bananaopenai-compatiblepi-agentproduct-imagesproduct-photographyreactredisself-hostedseller-toolssqlitetypescriptvite

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/EcomGen.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/ecomgen)

Questions

Does EcomGen run?
Yes. EcomGen runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 14 minutes, hitting 4 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test EcomGen?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 894e7fb62d50. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test EcomGen?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.15: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does EcomGen take to install?
14.1 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does EcomGen need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing EcomGen?
4 things broke in the recorded run, and 4 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does EcomGen compare with the alternatives?
Of the 75 ai-agent projects Argusic has installed and timed, EcomGen was the 58th fastest to reach a running state, and 48 of 75 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for EcomGen?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion