datagouv-mcp

Official data.gouv.fr Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that allows AI chatbots to search, explore, and analyze datasets from the French national Open Data platform, directly through conversation.

Runssource: GitHubhomepagePythonMITcommit 5a37d6f0f1da

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: mcp, mcp server, open data and opendata.

datagouv-mcp runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 1 minute and hit 1 error and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Python 3.12 environment with relaxed requires-python; package installs and builds; all 147 tests pass; MCP server starts and responds HTTP 200 on /health

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.02 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
1,601
forks
139
open issues
9
watchers
11
size
1 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing datagouv-mcp, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • requires-python=>=3.13,<3.15 but only Python 3.12 available1 minute
Install time
1 minutes
Cold machine to finish
5 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
1 hit, 1 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
pytest ran 147 passed, 2 deselected. Server started, curl http://localhost:8000/health returned 200.
Model tokens used
49,829
Exact commit tested
5a37d6f0f1da
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

true' in /work/repo
The server launched, the health endpoint returned HTTP 200, and the MCP tool operations ran correct…
**Errors encountered:**
- Python version requirement was `>=3.13,<3.15` but only Python 3.12 is available in the container.…
**Verified state:** All 147 tests pass. The server starts and responds with HTTP 200 on the `/healt…
2026-10-06T19:21:16.948394Z ERROR codex_core::session: failed to record rollout items: thread 01a11…
tokens used
49,829
The server launched, the health endpoint returned HTTP 200, and the MCP tool operations ran correct…
**Errors encountered:**
- Python version requirement was `>=3.13,<3.15` but only Python 3.12 is available in the container.…
**Verified state:** All 147 tests pass. The server starts and responds with HTTP 200 on the `/healt…

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 1 minute, faster than the median of the 12 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Recovered from all 1 error without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 13 mcp projects Argusic has installed and timed, datagouv-mcp was the 3rd fastest to reach a running state, and 11 of 13 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 1 minutes after the clone.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.02

Topics (from GitHub)

mcpmcp-serveropen-dataopendata

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/datagouv-mcp.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/datagouv-mcp)

Questions

Does datagouv-mcp run?
Yes. datagouv-mcp runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 1 minutes, hitting 1 error on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test datagouv-mcp?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 5a37d6f0f1da. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test datagouv-mcp?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.02: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does datagouv-mcp take to install?
1 minute in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does datagouv-mcp need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing datagouv-mcp?
1 thing broke in the recorded run, and 1 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does datagouv-mcp compare with the alternatives?
Of the 13 mcp projects Argusic has installed and timed, datagouv-mcp was the 3rd fastest to reach a running state, and 11 of 13 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for datagouv-mcp?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion