claude-token-optimizer

Cut the tokens Claude Code loads at session start. CLI that sets up a small CLAUDE.md with on-demand docs, measures startup tokens, and keeps them small.

Runssource: GitHubhomepageJavaScriptMITcommit a1e437a8c299

JavaScript, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: agents md, ai assistant, automation, claude, claude code, claude md, cli and context engineering.

claude-token-optimizer runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 6 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

All 414 tests pass, the CLI builds and runs all 10 commands correctly, 5 hook scripts fixed to use bash arithmetic instead of bc, Node upgraded from 18 to 20, and the package installs with only engine warnings

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.02 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
620
forks
80
open issues
10
watchers
2
size
0 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing claude-token-optimizer, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • bc not available in container; 5 hook scripts silently fell back to 0/? token estimates, causing 1 test failure3 minutes
  • Node 18 installed but project requires Node 20+2 minutes
  • [email protected] and [email protected] require Node >=22, only Node 20 available; EBADENGINE warnings but packages work
Install time
6 minutes
Cold machine to finish
8 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
npm test exited 0, 414 passed (was 413 before fix); node bin/cto.js --version returned 2.3.20; cto measure, init --yes --framework express, audit, compress, prune, diff, companions all produced correct output
Model tokens used
175,681
Exact commit tested
a1e437a8c299
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

All verified. Here's the JSON report:
**What was done:**
- Upgraded Node from v18 → v20.20.2. The project requires Node 20+; it was shipping with v18.
- Fixed 5 bash hook scripts (`pre-tool-token-guard.sh`, `session-end-token-report.sh`, `stop-sessio…
- After the fix, all 414 tests pass, all CLI commands (`measure`, `init`, `audit`, `compress`, `pru…
tokens used
175,681
All verified. Here's the JSON report:
**What was done:**
- Upgraded Node from v18 → v20.20.2. The project requires Node 20+; it was shipping with v18.
- Fixed 5 bash hook scripts (`pre-tool-token-guard.sh`, `session-end-token-report.sh`, `stop-sessio…
- After the fix, all 414 tests pass, all CLI commands (`measure`, `init`, `audit`, `compress`, `pru…

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 6 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 6 minutes after the clone.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.02

Topics (from GitHub)

agents-mdai-assistantautomationclaudeclaude-codeclaude-mdclicontext-engineeringdeveloper-toolsdocumentationllmnpm-packageopensourcesetup-templatetoken-optimization

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/claude-token-optimizer.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/claude-token-optimizer)

Questions

Does claude-token-optimizer run?
Yes. claude-token-optimizer runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 6 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test claude-token-optimizer?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit a1e437a8c299. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test claude-token-optimizer?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.02: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does claude-token-optimizer take to install?
6 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does claude-token-optimizer need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing claude-token-optimizer?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for claude-token-optimizer?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion