automem tested by Argusic Runner

Attempt 1 of 3 · Runs with mocks · Argusic Score 92.0 of 100

all runs of automemaiai-memoryanthropicautomemfalkordbgraph-database

Session recording

Loading recording...

Download the original recording · fingerprint 8c99184297b6fb0f...

What the test found

In this container: make install succeeds, python app.py boots and serves /health, the unit suite passes 664 tests, and authenticated store/recall/query/delete flows work over HTTP against the schema-compatible in-memory mock.

No docker, no redis/qdrant binaries. Standard install worked. First app launch via PORT=8001 python app.py kept running (background) and answered 200 on /health (degraded). I then built a temporary in-repo harness (tests/endtoend/, removed from repo at end) that ran the real Flask app end to end: 7/7 tests passed with health falkordb/qdrant connected, store->recall roundtrip, update, delete, associate, tag pagination/bulk delete. I also launched the real HTTP server (python app.py equivalent) on :8001 with the in-memory backends and observed HTTP 201 on POST /memory, HTTP 200 on GET /recall (matching memory surfaced), HTTP 200 on GET /memory/by-tag and DELETE /memory/by-tag, Healthy status when both stores connected. Unit suite: 664 passed, 1 skipped (rate limiting not implemented).

Argusic installed automem in 3 minutes and launched it; verification reached Verified with mock services. 2 of 2 recorded errors were worked through (see the timeline below).

Runs with mocksall runs of automem

This summary is drawn from the agent's recorded report for this run. Every figure traces to the log and recording above; nothing here is authored.

Error and fix timeline

No errors were recorded for this run.

Discussion