wcgw
Shell and coding agent on mcp clients
Runssource: GitHubPythonApache-2.0commit e68885e2e08b
Python, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: agent, ai agent, ai coding, anthropic, chatgpt, claude, claude desktop and custom gpt.
wcgw runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 3 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
wcgw 5.6.5 is fully installed, all 63 pytest tests pass, the MCP server entry point (wcgw) and CLI (wcgw_local) both respond to --help, and all package imports resolve cleanly.
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
- Install time
- 3 minutes
- Cold machine to finish
- 2 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- uv run pytest passed 63 tests (0 failures, 0 errors), coverage 80%; uv run wcgw --help printed usage; uv run wcgw_local --help printed usage; python import of wcgw.mcp_server succeeded
- Model tokens used
- 12,263
- Exact commit tested
- e68885e2e08b
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
│ current shell, to copy it or │
│ customize the installation. │
│ --help Show this message and exit. │
╰──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
All 63 tests pass, both CLI entry points work, and imports are clean. Here's the summary:
Everything worked out of the box — `uv sync` installed all dependencies, `uv sync --group tests` ad…
**ARGUSIC_RESULT:** {"install_succeeded": true, "launch_succeeded": true, "install_minutes": 3, "er…
tokens used
12,263
All 63 tests pass, both CLI entry points work, and imports are clean. Here's the summary:
Everything worked out of the box — `uv sync` installed all dependencies, `uv sync --group tests` ad…
**ARGUSIC_RESULT:** {"install_succeeded": true, "launch_succeeded": true, "install_minutes": 3, "er…Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Installed in 3 minutes, faster than the median of the 32 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
- Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.
- Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.
Of the 33 agent projects Argusic has installed and timed, wcgw was the 11th fastest to reach a running state, and 25 of 33 reached one at all.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
- A quick evaluation: it was running 3 minutes after the clone.
- Following its own README: the documented path worked with nothing to fix.
Also tested, in the same area
Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.
Run history
Topics (from GitHub)
agentai-agentai-codinganthropicchatgptclaudeclaude-desktopcustom-gptllmllm-agentllm-codemcpmcp-serveropenaishellterminal
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/wcgw)Questions
- Does wcgw run?
- Yes. wcgw runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 3 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test wcgw?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit e68885e2e08b. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test wcgw?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.01: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does wcgw take to install?
- 3 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does wcgw need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing wcgw?
- Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
- How does wcgw compare with the alternatives?
- Of the 33 agent projects Argusic has installed and timed, wcgw was the 11th fastest to reach a running state, and 25 of 33 reached one at all.
- Where is the evidence for wcgw?
- All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.