spook

A scary 馃懟 powerful toolbox 馃О for Home Assistant 馃彙

Not yet testedsource: GitHubhomepagePythonMITcommit 532d371c18bf

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: hacs integration, home assistant, home assistant component, home assistant config, home assistant configuration, home assistant custom, home assistant integration and home automation.

spook has not been verified yet.

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence.

At a glance

verdict
Not yet tested
Argusic Score
not scored yet
recorded runs
0
last tested
-
stars
1,334
forks
98
open issues
13
watchers
7
size
24 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

No recorded runs.

Topics (from GitHub)

hacs-integrationhome-assistanthome-assistant-componenthome-assistant-confighome-assistant-configurationhome-assistant-customhome-assistant-integrationhome-automationhome-destructionhomeassistanthomeassistant-homiehomeyhomiepowerfulpowertoolsrandomspookytoolbox

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/spook.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/spook)

Questions

Does spook run?
spook has not been fully verified yet. No recorded run has produced a verdict yet.
How did Argusic test spook?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded. 0 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
Where is the evidence for spook?
All 0 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion