security-audit-skill
A coding-agent skill for multi-phase security audits with independently verified, machine-readable findings
Runssource: GitHubJavaScriptMITcommit c1c8a8c14710
JavaScript, MIT licensed.
security-audit-skill runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 0 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
Both zero-dependency Node.js validator modules pass all 65 tests, the JSON schema is valid, and the CLI validators correctly validate empty findings and coverage-ledger documents.
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
- Install time
- under a minute
- Cold machine to finish
- 1 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- node --test validate-findings.test.cjs validate-coverage-ledger.test.cjs exited 0, 65 passed, 0 failed
- Model tokens used
- 49,085
- Exact commit tested
- c1c8a8c14710
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
- All `.cjs` files pass Node syntax check. **Errors encountered:** none. tokens used 49,085 Here's my final assessment. This is a **security audit skill** — a set of documentation, attack-class references, and zero-depe… **What I ran and what came back:** - Both test files execute cleanly under Node 18 with no prior install step (the validators are zero… - Both CLI entry points correctly validate empty documents: `coverage-ledger.cjs` prints `PASS: 0 c… - `report-schema.json` parses as valid JSON. - All `.cjs` files pass Node syntax check. **Errors encountered:** none.
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Installed in 0 minutes.
- Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
What did not, or is not known
- Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
- A quick evaluation: it was running 0 minutes after the clone.
- Following its own README: the documented path worked with nothing to fix.
Run history
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/security-audit-skill)Questions
- Does security-audit-skill run?
- Yes. security-audit-skill runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 0 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test security-audit-skill?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit c1c8a8c14710. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test security-audit-skill?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.01: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does security-audit-skill take to install?
- 0 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does security-audit-skill need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing security-audit-skill?
- Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
- Where is the evidence for security-audit-skill?
- The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.