node-red

Low-code programming for event-driven applications

Runssource: GitHubhomepageJavaScriptApache-2.0commit 1e85f1efbc88

JavaScript, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: flow based programming, javascript, low code, node red, openjs foundation and visual programming.

node-red runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 16 minutes and hit 2 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Node-RED v5.0.7 installed, built, started on port 1880 returning HTTP 200, and the full test suite (core+nodes) passes 2864 tests with 0 failures.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 95 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
95 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.13 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
23,825
forks
4,027
open issues
369
watchers
531
size
74 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing node-red, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • ssh-keygen not found in container (5 test failures)5 minutes
  • Node.js v18.19.1 not supported (requires >=22.9.0) - red.js and lib/red.js exit with error2 minutes
Install time
16 minutes
Cold machine to finish
17 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
2 hit, 2 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
npm run mocha:core: 1293 passing, 0 failing; npm run mocha:nodes: 1571 passing, 0 failing; curl -s -o /dev/null -w %{http_code} http://localhost:1880/ returned 200
Model tokens used
67,573
Exact commit tested
1e85f1efbc88
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

 succeeded in 0ms:
1793631647
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'find /work/repo -name "AGENTS.md" -o -name ".agents.md" 2>/dev/null' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 13ms:
/work/repo/node_modules/cytoscape/AGENTS.md
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'date -d @1793631647 2>/dev/null || date' in /work/repo
 succeeded in 0ms:
Mon Nov  2 15:00:47 UTC 2026
tokens used
67,573

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 16 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 2 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.13
Argusic Runner1/3Runs90.000.02

Topics (from GitHub)

flow-based-programmingjavascriptlow-codenode-redopenjs-foundationvisual-programming

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/node-red.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/node-red)

Questions

Does node-red run?
Yes. node-red runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 16 minutes, hitting 2 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test node-red?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 1e85f1efbc88. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test node-red?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.13: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does node-red take to install?
16 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does node-red need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing node-red?
2 things broke in the recorded run, and 2 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for node-red?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion