lunar
An open-source package that brings the power of modern headless e-commerce functionality to Laravel.
Runssource: GitHubhomepagePHPMITcommit 82f6e4a64585
PHP, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: e commerce, ecommerce, filamentphp, headless, laravel and php.
lunar runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 9 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
Lunar monorepo installed via Composer on PHP 8.5.11, all 5 test suites (core, admin, search, shipping, stripe) pass individually, 969 passed, 0 failed, 1 skipped, running on file-backed SQLite via orchestra/testbench. Full-suite parallel run has 22 pre-existing SQLite lock-contention failures.
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 50 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
What went wrong, in the agent's own words
The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.
- PHP runtime not installed in container2 minutes
- Composer not installed in container1 minute
- PHP memory limit too low (128MB) causing OOM in tests1 minute
- Install time
- 9 minutes
- Cold machine to finish
- 36 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- vendor/bin/pest --testsuite=core: 1 skipped, 596 passed (2121 assertions); --testsuite=admin: 222 passed (741); --testsuite=search: 4 passed (21); --testsuite=shipping: 99 passed (324); --testsuite=stripe: 48 passed (140). All 5 suites pass individually with 969 total passing tests and 0 failures. A combined run (all suites in one process) hit 22 pre-existing SQLite file-locking failures (DB path uses getmypid(), so parallel suites share a single temp file).
- Model tokens used
- 584,259
- Exact commit tested
- 82f6e4a64585
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
Tests: 99 passed (324 assertions) === STRIPE === Tests: 48 passed (140 assertions) Let me get the current time for the install duration exec /bin/sh -lc 'date -u +%s' in /work/repo succeeded in 0ms: 1790799206 All results are in. Let me compile the final report. tokens used 584,259 All results are in. Let me compile the final report.
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Installed in 9 minutes.
- Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
- Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
- A quick evaluation: it was running 9 minutes after the clone.
Also tested, in the same area
Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.
Run history
| tested by | attempt | outcome | score | cost USD | when |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Argusic Runner | 2/3 | Runs | 100.00 | 0.18 | |
| Argusic Runner | 1/3 | Did not run | 0.00 | 0.18 |
Topics (from GitHub)
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/lunar)Questions
- Does lunar run?
- Yes. lunar runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 9 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test lunar?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 82f6e4a64585. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test lunar?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.18: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does lunar take to install?
- 9 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does lunar need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing lunar?
- 3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
- Where is the evidence for lunar?
- All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.