libsql

libSQL is a fork of SQLite that is both Open Source, and Open Contributions.

Runssource: GitHubhomepageCMITcommit d6c75af6353b

C, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: database, embedded database, rust, sqlite and webassembly.

libsql runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 21 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

sqld server builds from source with Rust 1.85.0, listens on HTTP and gRPC, answers SQL queries correctly via the v1 Hrana-over-HTTP API, and 102 of 105 tests pass across the workspace.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.08 (measured)
recorded runs
3
last tested
stars
17,227
forks
533
open issues
455
watchers
89
size
191 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing libsql, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Rust toolchain not installed (no rustc, cargo, rustup)1 minute
  • protoc not installed, needed by libsql_replication test build.rs1 minute
  • 3 libsql-server tests failed (attach_auth, attach_auth_with_uuids, basic_metrics)
Install time
21 minutes
Cold machine to finish
29 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8098/v1/execute -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{"stmt":{"sql":"SELECT 1 + 1 AS res"}}' returned {"result":{"cols":[{"name":"res","decltype":null}],"rows":[[{"type":"integer","value":"2"}]],...}}
Model tokens used
180,384
Exact commit tested
d6c75af6353b
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

Watch the session

The whole run, from a clean machine, at the speed it actually happened. Nothing is cut and nothing is sped up.

A recording of attempt 1, run . The verdict above comes from a different attempt, so read this as one session and not as the current result. The terminal recording it was made from is the evidence, stored with a sha256 fingerprint; the video is a rendering of it. Nothing loads from the video host until you press play.

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

- `POST /v1/execute` returned `{"result":{"cols":[{"name":"res","decltype":null}],"rows":[[{"type":…
- `POST /v1/batch` also returned correct results
- Binary reports `sqld sqld 0.24.33 (d6c75af6 2026-09-22)` via `--version`
**Test results:**
- `libsql` crate: **27 + 9 doc-tests + 2 replication = 38 passed**
- `libsql-server` standalone: **13 passed**, 3 failed (pre-existing bugs in attach auth & metrics t…
- `libsql-server` hrana: **22 passed**
- `libsql-server` auth: **2 passed**
- `libsql-server` cluster: **13 passed**, 1 ignored
- `libsql-server` bottomless: **1 passed**, 1 ignored
- `libsql_replication`: **13 passed**
- `libsql-sys`, `libsql-ffi`: compiled, no tests

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 3 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What did not, or is not known

  • Took 21 minutes to install, slower than the median of the 13 comparable projects Argusic has measured.

Of the 14 database projects Argusic has installed and timed, libsql was the 14th fastest to reach a running state, and 13 of 14 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner3/3Runs100.000.08
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.07
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.11

Topics (from GitHub)

databaseembedded-databaserustsqlitewebassembly

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/libsql.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/libsql)

Questions

Does libsql run?
Yes. libsql runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 21 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test libsql?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit d6c75af6353b. 3 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test libsql?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.08: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does libsql take to install?
21 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does libsql need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing libsql?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does libsql compare with the alternatives?
Of the 14 database projects Argusic has installed and timed, libsql was the 14th fastest to reach a running state, and 13 of 14 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for libsql?
All 3 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion