iredis

Interactive Redis: A Terminal Client for Redis with AutoCompletion and Syntax Highlighting.

Runssource: GitHubhomepagePythonBSD-3-Clausecommit 554bff6bfaa4

Python, BSD-3-Clause licensed. The project labels itself: command line tool, redis, redis cli and redis client.

iredis runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 6 minutes and hit 3 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

IRedis installed, all 791 tests pass against a real Redis 7.2 server, and non-interactive CLI produces correct output (PING -> PONG)

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.03 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
2,760
forks
121
open issues
49
watchers
16
size
4 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing iredis, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • no redis-server binary in container2 minutes
  • PEP 668 blocks system pip install1 minute
  • REDIS_VERSION env var not set0.5 minutes
Install time
6 minutes
Cold machine to finish
7 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
3 hit, 3 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
REDIS_VERSION=7.2 poetry run pytest -q exited 0: 791 passed, 6 skipped, 2 xfailed, 1 xpassed in 48s
Model tokens used
34,579
Exact commit tested
554bff6bfaa4
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

# About 6-7 minutes elapsed. But let's get a precise figure
TZ=UTC0 printf \"Start: %s\\nEnd: %s\\nDiff: %d seconds\\n\" \""'$(date -d @1790968542)" "$(date -d…
 succeeded in 0ms:
Start: Fri Oct  2 19:15:42 UTC 2026
End: Fri Oct  2 19:21:42 UTC 2026
Diff: 360 seconds
exec
/bin/sh -lc "cd /work/repo && echo '{\"install_succeeded\": true, \"launch_succeeded\": true, \"ins…
 succeeded in 0ms:
{"install_succeeded": true, "launch_succeeded": true, "install_minutes": 6, "errors": [{"msg": "PEP…
tokens used
34,579

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 6 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 3 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed BSD-3-Clause, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 6 minutes after the clone.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.03

Topics (from GitHub)

command-line-toolredisredis-cliredis-client

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/iredis.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/iredis)

Questions

Does iredis run?
Yes. iredis runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 6 minutes, hitting 3 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test iredis?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 554bff6bfaa4. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test iredis?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.03: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does iredis take to install?
6 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does iredis need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing iredis?
3 things broke in the recorded run, and 3 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for iredis?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion