hestia-core

A grid-based, modular dashboard built entirely from HTML, CSS, and JS with the ability to create your custom API integrations.

Runssource: GitHubJavaScriptMITcommit 35e4df6753d6

JavaScript, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: dashboard, homelab and startpage.

hestia-core runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 0.5 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Project Hestia dashboard serves correctly, the page loads, all JS modules parse and execute, the dashboard container, toolbar, and settings panel render, and the app boots to 'Ready' state with zero runtime errors.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 90 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
90 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.08 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
684
forks
43
open issues
1
watchers
4
size
19 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
under a minute
Cold machine to finish
18 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
Model tokens used
63,966
Exact commit tested
35e4df6753d6
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

How the result was proved
runs before 2026-09-07 did not record the command used to check the result
Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

- **Page errors**: none ✓
Everything works. Now let me also verify the Docker build since the README mentions it as the recom…
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'which docker 2>/dev/null && docker version 2>&1 | head -5' in /work/repo
 exited 1 in 0ms:
Docker is not available. That's OK — the README says both Docker and static/manual work. The manual…
Let me clean up and record the final results
exec
/bin/sh -lc 'pkill -f "http.server" 2>/dev/null; pkill -f "node test_hestia" 2>/dev/null; echo "cle…
 exited 143 in 0ms:
tokens used
63,966

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 0.5 minutes.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 0.5 minutes after the clone.
  • Following its own README: the documented path worked with nothing to fix.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Unverified80.000.02
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.08

Topics (from GitHub)

dashboardhomelabstartpage

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/hestia-core.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/hestia-core)

Questions

Does hestia-core run?
Yes. hestia-core runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 1 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test hestia-core?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 35e4df6753d6. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test hestia-core?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.08: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does hestia-core take to install?
0.5 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does hestia-core need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing hestia-core?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
Where is the evidence for hestia-core?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion