gpt-load

Self-hosted AI gateway for multi-channel, multi-credential setups, API keys and subscription accounts, scheduling, failover, request logs and usage. 自托管 AI 网关:多渠道多凭据统一接入,含密钥与订阅账号、调度容错、日志与用量。

Runssource: GitHubhomepageGoMITcommit ae59a0ae8515

Go, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: ai gateway, anthropic, api gateway, claude, claude code, codex, gemini and gin.

gpt-load runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 45 minutes and hit 5 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.09 (measured)
recorded runs
2
last tested
stars
6,964
forks
772
open issues
22
watchers
18
size
27 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing gpt-load, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Go compiler not found in environment3 minutes
  • Node.js v18.19.1 too old; web UI requires >=24.11.02 minutes
  • corepack not in PATH so pnpm was unavailable2 minutes
  • Web UI build failed: @rolldown/binding-linux-x64-gnu missing (frozen lockfile skips optional deps)2 minutes
  • Docker compose contract tests fail: docker not in PATH (6 subtest failures)
Install time
45 minutes
Cold machine to finish
20 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
5 hit, 5 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
curl http://127.0.0.1:3001/health returned 200 with {"status":"ok","version":"2.0.0-dev"}; curl http://127.0.0.1:3001/ returned 200 with valid HTML; go test -count=1 . ./internal/... exited 1 only for Docker-dependent tests (58/58 Go packages passed)
Model tokens used
126,517
Exact commit tested
ae59a0ae8515
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

Watch the session

The whole run, from a clean machine, at the speed it actually happened. Nothing is cut and nothing is sped up.

A recording of attempt 2, run , the attempt that decided the verdict above. The terminal recording it was made from is the evidence, stored with a sha256 fingerprint; the video is a rendering of it. Nothing loads from the video host until you press play.

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="committed control operations recovered" event=startup.op…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="runtime state checkpoint checked" event=startup.checkpoi…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="execution runtime started" event=startup.execution_runti…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="HTTP listener bound" event=startup.server_listen address…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="request log runtime started" event=startup.request_log_s…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="GPT-Load 2.0 server started" event=startup.ready address…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="control runtime started" event=startup.control_runtime_s…
time="2026-09-16 16:36:00" level=info msg="[CONTROL] Models.dev catalog synchronization started" ev…
200
{"status":"ok","version":"2.0.0-dev"}
tokens used
126,517

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 45 minutes.
  • Recovered from all 5 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
  • Measured 2 times, so the result is not a one-off.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner2/3Runs100.000.09
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.04

Topics (from GitHub)

ai-gatewayanthropicapi-gatewayclaudeclaude-codecodexgeminigingogolangllmllm-gatewayload-balanceropenaiself-hosted

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/gpt-load.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/gpt-load)

Questions

Does gpt-load run?
Yes. gpt-load runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 45 minutes, hitting 5 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test gpt-load?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit ae59a0ae8515. 2 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test gpt-load?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.09: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does gpt-load take to install?
45 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does gpt-load need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing gpt-load?
5 things broke in the recorded run, and 5 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
Where is the evidence for gpt-load?
All 2 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion