duckduckgo-mcp-server

A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides web search capabilities through DuckDuckGo, with additional features for content fetching and parsing.

Runs with mockssource: GitHubPythonMITcommit 8182af3f2295

Python, MIT licensed.

duckduckgo-mcp-server runs, with stand-ins for the services it depends on. An Argusic agent installed it in 0.1 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

All 136 tests pass (128 unit + 8 e2e), ruff lint passes, and the server starts on streamable-http transport and prints its configuration banner and listen address.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 92 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs with mocks
Argusic Score
92 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.01 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
1,525
forks
191
open issues
3
watchers
8
size
0 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
under a minute
Cold machine to finish
1 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
uv sync installed 48 packages with 0 errors; `pytest` ran all 136 tests (128 unit + 8 e2e) with 0 failures in 4.3s; `ruff check .` passed; `duckduckgo-mcp-server --help` printed full usage; `duckduckgo-mcp-server --transport streamable-http` started and printed 'Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000'
Model tokens used
17,455
Exact commit tested
8182af3f2295
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Behaviour against real services
this run was verified against stand-in services only

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

INFO:     Waiting for application shutdown.
[10/07/26 13:32:40] INFO     StreamableHTTP       streamable_http_manager.py:152
                             session manager
                             shutting down
INFO:     Application shutdown complete.
INFO:     Finished server process [653]
All checks pass, tests pass, server launches cleanly. Here's the final report:
**ARGUSIC_RESULT:** {"install_succeeded": true, "launch_succeeded": true, "install_minutes": 0.15, …
tokens used
17,455
All checks pass, tests pass, server launches cleanly. Here's the final report:
**ARGUSIC_RESULT:** {"install_succeeded": true, "launch_succeeded": true, "install_minutes": 0.15, …

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Installed in 0.1 minutes, faster than the median of the 34 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Only reached a running state against stand-in services, so nothing here proves it works against the real ones.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 35 Python projects Argusic has installed and timed, duckduckgo-mcp-server was the 5th fastest to reach a running state, and 19 of 35 reached one at all.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs with mocks92.000.01

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/duckduckgo-mcp-server.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/duckduckgo-mcp-server)

Questions

Does duckduckgo-mcp-server run?
duckduckgo-mcp-server runs, with mocks standing in for external services. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 0 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test duckduckgo-mcp-server?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 8182af3f2295. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test duckduckgo-mcp-server?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.01: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does duckduckgo-mcp-server take to install?
0.1 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does duckduckgo-mcp-server need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing duckduckgo-mcp-server?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
How does duckduckgo-mcp-server compare with the alternatives?
Of the 35 Python projects Argusic has installed and timed, duckduckgo-mcp-server was the 5th fastest to reach a running state, and 19 of 35 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for duckduckgo-mcp-server?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion