Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server

Resolve project server with automatic backups and an updated Postgresql version

Runssource: GitHubPythonMITcommit 3855ab46264c

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: backup, davinci resolve, docker, postgresql and video production.

Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 5 minutes and hit 2 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

PostgreSQL 16 server runs locally on port 5432 with user postgres/password DaVinci, database 'database' created, backups functioning, and pgadmin-config-creator generates correct server config JSON.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs
Argusic Score
100 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.02 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
322
forks
33
open issues
1
watchers
9
size
0 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Time lost to each failure while testing Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server, drawn from the recorded run
Every bar is a failure the agent recorded, with the time it cost. Drawn from this run, not from anywhere else.

What went wrong, in the agent's own words

The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.

  • Docker not available in container (no root). Extracted PostgreSQL 16 from apt .deb packages instead of using compose image postgres:13.2 minutes
  • PostgreSQL couldn't create lock file at /var/run/postgresql (permission denied).1 minute
Install time
5 minutes
Cold machine to finish
5 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
2 hit, 2 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
PGPASSWORD=DaVinci psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U postgres -d database -c 'SELECT 1' returned 1 row; pg_dump --format=custom created valid backup; pg_isready returned 'accepting connections'; pgadmin-config-creator produced valid JSON config.
Model tokens used
131,673
Exact commit tested
3855ab46264c
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

Here is the complete report of what happened and what was verified.
This repo is a Docker Compose stack (PostgreSQL 13 + pgbackups + pgadmin + pgadmin-config-creator).…
**Errors encountered:**
1. **Docker not installed** — There is no Docker, podman, or containerd runtime in this container. …
2. **`/var/run/postgresql` not writable** — PostgreSQL's default unix socket path requires root. Fi…
**Verification (all passed):**
- `pg_isready -h localhost -p 5432` → `accepting connections`
- `PGPASSWORD=DaVinci psql -h localhost -p 5432 -U postgres -d database -c "SELECT 1"` → returns `1`
- `pg_dump --blobs --format=custom --quote-all-identifiers` → creates valid `.backup` file
- `pg_restore -l` → lists table and sequence TOC entries
- `pgadmin-config-creator/app.py` → syntax OK, produces valid `servers.json` with correct host/port…
- `docker-compose.yml` → valid YAML with 4 services and expected ports

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
  • Installed in 5 minutes, faster than the median of the 44 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Recovered from all 2 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
  • Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 45 backup projects Argusic has installed and timed, Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server was the 17th fastest to reach a running state, and 29 of 45 reached one at all.

What it is a reasonable choice for

  • Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
  • A quick evaluation: it was running 5 minutes after the clone.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs100.000.02

Topics (from GitHub)

backupdavinci-resolvedockerpostgresqlvideo-production

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/docker-davinci-resolve-project-server)

Questions

Does Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server run?
Yes. Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 5 minutes, hitting 2 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 3855ab46264c. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.02: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server take to install?
5 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server?
2 things broke in the recorded run, and 2 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
How does Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server compare with the alternatives?
Of the 45 backup projects Argusic has installed and timed, Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server was the 17th fastest to reach a running state, and 29 of 45 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for Docker-Davinci-Resolve-Project-Server?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion