codex-ppt-skill

GPT-Image-2 PPT Generator Skill for Creating Image-Based PowerPoint Presentations in Codex and Other Skill-Compatible Agents

Runs with mockssource: GitHubhomepagePythonMITcommit 445b1780c85c

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: agent skills, ai ppt, claude code, codex, gpt image 2, powerpoint, ppt and ppt skill.

codex-ppt-skill runs, with stand-ins for the services it depends on. An Argusic agent installed it in 1.2 minutes and hit no errors on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.

Dependencies install cleanly, all 9 image-model unit tests pass, the PPT assembly script produces a valid .pptx with correctly numbered slides and speaker notes, the image generation CLI dry-runs produce valid request payloads, and the shared runtime bootstrap completes without error.

What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 92 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).

At a glance

verdict
Runs with mocks
Argusic Score
92 / 100
cost of the verifying run
$0.01 (measured)
recorded runs
1
last tested
stars
6,279
forks
309
open issues
1
watchers
9
size
44 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

What was measured

From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.

Install time
1 minutes
Cold machine to finish
2 minutes
Errors hit and fixed
0 hit, 0 fixed with no human help
How the result was proved
.venv/bin/python -m unittest tests/test_image_gen_models.py -v exited 0, 9 passed; .venv/bin/python -c ... assemble_ppt create_presentation returned True, 3 slides in output PPTX; image_gen.py --dry-run output correct JSON payload
Model tokens used
43,510
Exact commit tested
445b1780c85c
Container image
sha256:cdd920bce783

What was not measured

The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.

Peak GPU memory
this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
Behaviour over a long run
each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
Behaviour against real services
this run was verified against stand-in services only

The end of the recording

The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.

- **Verified provider loader**: `image_providers.create_image_provider` loaded without import error…
No errors were hit. The project's core scripts (image model validation, PPT assembly, runtime manag…
tokens used
43,510
All tests pass and the scripts work correctly. Let me assemble the final report.
Work done:
- **Installed dependencies**: Created a virtual environment at `/work/repo/.venv` and installed `py…
- **Ran tests**: `unittest tests/test_image_gen_models.py` — all 9 tests passed.
- **Verified PPT assembly**: Created a temp directory with 3 dummy PNG slides and a `speech.md`, ra…
- **Verified image gen CLI**: `image_gen.py generate --prompt "..." --dry-run` printed correct defa…
- **Verified provider loader**: `image_providers.create_image_provider` loaded without import error…
No errors were hit. The project's core scripts (image model validation, PPT assembly, runtime manag…

Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.

How it was tested

One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.

Strengths and limits

Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.

What went well

  • Installed in 1.2 minutes, faster than the median of the 18 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
  • Nothing broke on the way: zero errors between clone and running.
  • Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.

What did not, or is not known

  • Only reached a running state against stand-in services, so nothing here proves it works against the real ones.
  • Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.

Of the 19 agent-skills projects Argusic has installed and timed, codex-ppt-skill was the 6th fastest to reach a running state, and 14 of 19 reached one at all.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

tested byattemptoutcomescorecost USDwhen
Argusic Runner1/3Runs with mocks92.000.01

Topics (from GitHub)

agent-skillsai-pptclaude-codecodexgpt-image-2powerpointpptppt-skillpptxpresentationskill

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/codex-ppt-skill.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/codex-ppt-skill)

Questions

Does codex-ppt-skill run?
codex-ppt-skill runs, with mocks standing in for external services. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 1 minutes, hitting 0 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
How did Argusic test codex-ppt-skill?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit 445b1780c85c. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
What did it cost to test codex-ppt-skill?
The run that produced this verdict cost $0.01: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
How long does codex-ppt-skill take to install?
1.2 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
Does codex-ppt-skill need a GPU?
Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
What goes wrong when installing codex-ppt-skill?
Nothing did, in the recorded run: zero errors between clone and running.
How does codex-ppt-skill compare with the alternatives?
Of the 19 agent-skills projects Argusic has installed and timed, codex-ppt-skill was the 6th fastest to reach a running state, and 14 of 19 reached one at all.
Where is the evidence for codex-ppt-skill?
The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion