bustub
The BusTub Relational Database Management System (Educational)
Runssource: GitHubhomepageC++MITcommit c0a543198528
C++, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: database and dbms.
bustub runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 1 minute and hit 2 errors and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
BusTub builds completely with g++ 13 on Ubuntu 24.04, producing 41 test binaries and 8 CLI tool binaries; 6 test suites passing 35 individual tests, all remaining tests abort on intentional educational stubs.
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 83.3 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
What went wrong, in the agent's own words
The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.
- Missing libelf-dev and libdwarf-dev system packages1 minute
- Missing clang-15 compiler (using g++ 13 instead)
- Install time
- 1 minutes
- Cold machine to finish
- 10 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 2 hit, 2 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- make -j$(nproc) exited 0, all 222 build targets compiled (100%). Individual test binaries exercised: disk_manager_test returned '[PASSED] 4 tests', rwlatch_test '[PASSED] 1 test', binder_test '[PASSED] 23 tests', type_test '[PASSED] 5 tests', crash_test '[PASSED] 1 test', arc_replacer_performance_test '[PASSED] 1 test'. All 8 binary tools in bin/ respond to --help with usage text.
- Model tokens used
- 141,055
- Exact commit tested
- c0a543198528
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
[100%] Built target bpm-bench Test binaries built: 41 Passing test suites and count: disk_manager_test: PASSED ] 4 tests. rwlatch_test: binder_test: PASSED ] 23 tests. type_test: PASSED ] 5 tests. crash_test: arc_replacer_performance_test: Here's the complete ARGUSIC_RESULT report: tokens used 141,055 Here's the complete ARGUSIC_RESULT report:
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Installed in 1 minute, faster than the median of the 35 comparable projects Argusic has measured.
- Recovered from all 2 errors without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed MIT, as reported by its host.
- Measured 3 times, so the result is not a one-off.
Of the 36 database projects Argusic has installed and timed, bustub was the 6th fastest to reach a running state, and 29 of 36 reached one at all.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
- A quick evaluation: it was running 1 minutes after the clone.
Also tested, in the same area
Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.
Run history
Topics (from GitHub)
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/bustub)Questions
- Does bustub run?
- Yes. bustub runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 1 minutes, hitting 2 errors on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test bustub?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit c0a543198528. 3 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test bustub?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.04: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does bustub take to install?
- 1 minute in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does bustub need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing bustub?
- 2 things broke in the recorded run, and 2 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
- How does bustub compare with the alternatives?
- Of the 36 database projects Argusic has installed and timed, bustub was the 6th fastest to reach a running state, and 29 of 36 reached one at all.
- Where is the evidence for bustub?
- All 3 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.