ai-prd-workflow

RFC-driven development for AI coding agents: idea or existing codebase → verified PRD → features → rules → sequenced RFCs → reviewed code. Agent Skills for Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Devin.

Not yet testedsource: GitHubhomepagePythonMITcommit 2bc8b2981b34

Python, MIT licensed. The project labels itself: agent skills, agentic coding, ai tools, ai workflow, claude, claude code, claude code plugin and codex.

ai-prd-workflow has not been verified yet.

Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence.

At a glance

verdict
Not yet tested
Argusic Score
not scored yet
recorded runs
0
last tested
-
stars
298
forks
34
open issues
0
watchers
5
size
0 MB
created
last push

Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.

Also tested, in the same area

Every one of these was installed and run by Argusic on a clean machine. Nothing appears here that was not tested.

Run history

No recorded runs.

Topics (from GitHub)

agent-skillsagentic-codingai-toolsai-workflowclaudeclaude-codeclaude-code-plugincodexcursor-aigemini-cligithub-copilotllmprdprompt-engineeringrfcspec-driven-developmentvibe-coding

Embed the badge

Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.

[![Tested by Argusic](https://argusic.com/badge/ai-prd-workflow.svg)](https://argusic.com/subject/ai-prd-workflow)

Questions

Does ai-prd-workflow run?
ai-prd-workflow has not been fully verified yet. No recorded run has produced a verdict yet.
How did Argusic test ai-prd-workflow?
On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded. 0 attempts are recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
Where is the evidence for ai-prd-workflow?
All 0 recorded runs are on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.

Discussion