across
Across the Great Wall we can reach every corner in the world
Runssource: GitHubhomepageShellApache-2.0commit fdb40962837b
Shell, Apache-2.0 licensed. The project labels itself: auto transfer backup, backup, bbr, benchmark, kms, l2tp, shell and unixbench.
across runs. An Argusic agent installed it in 0 minutes and hit 1 error and fixed every one without help on a clean machine with no GPU, and the whole session was recorded.
All 10+ shell scripts pass syntax validation; bench.sh runs end-to-end collecting system info, disk I/O benchmark, and Ookla speedtest results. Root-required scripts (bbr.sh, backup.sh, kms.sh, wireguard.sh) correctly guard for root. Dockerfiles and deb/rpm builders are idle without Docker.
What the agent ended up with on a clean machine, in its own words. How this is measured
Measured by Argusic on a fresh machine every time. Every number links to its evidence. Argusic Score 100 of 100 (the mean of this project's run scores).
At a glance
Subject data from GitHub, linked at the top of this page, refreshed . Test data by Argusic (CC BY 4.0); every number links to a run page with the full log, the recording, and their sha256 hashes.
What was measured
From the run that decided this verdict. Every line is a recorded value, not an estimate.
What went wrong, in the agent's own words
The agent's own words, worst first, never rewritten into advice.
- wget not found in container, bench.sh speedtest download failed5 minutes
- Install time
- under a minute
- Cold machine to finish
- 18 minutes
- Errors hit and fixed
- 1 hit, 1 fixed with no human help
- How the result was proved
- bash /work/repo/bench.sh completed: I/O test 34.2 MB/s average, Speedtest.net 459.36 Mbps up / 5912.81 Mbps down at 0.90 ms latency
- Model tokens used
- 106,092
- Exact commit tested
- fdb40962837b
- Container image
- sha256:cdd920bce783
What was not measured
The other half, so you can see exactly how far this evidence goes. A gap is printed as a gap and never filled in.
- Peak GPU memory
- this ran on a CPU machine, so there was no GPU to sample
- Behaviour over a long run
- each attempt uses the smallest documented settings and a fixed time budget, so this measures whether it runs, not how it holds up under load
The end of the recording
The last lines of the terminal session that decided this verdict, exactly as they were recorded.
- Dockerfiles in `/work/repo/docker/` cannot be tested because Docker is not installed. - The `deb/` and `rpm/` build directories require Docker + build toolchains not available here. - Two China-based speedtest servers timed out (Suzhou, Ningbo) — expected for a US-based container. tokens used 106,092 All scripts pass syntax checking. Let me summarize what I've verified: - All 10+ shell scripts (`bench.sh`, `bbr.sh`, `backup.sh`, `kms.sh`, `wireguard.sh`, `ftp_upload.s… - `bench.sh` ran end-to-end: system info collection, I/O disk benchmark (34.2 MB/s average over 3 r… - Root-required scripts (`bbr.sh`, `backup.sh`, `kms.sh`, `wireguard.sh`) correctly refuse to run a… - Dockerfiles in `/work/repo/docker/` cannot be tested because Docker is not installed. - The `deb/` and `rpm/` build directories require Docker + build toolchains not available here. - Two China-based speedtest servers timed out (Suzhou, Ningbo) — expected for a US-based container.
Replay the whole session, every command from a clean machine to this point.
How it was tested
One agent, one container, no human help. It installs the project the way its own documentation says to, runs it, and fixes what breaks. Everything below is recorded as it happened: the terminal session, the log and the exact commit. The full method.
Strengths and limits
Measured facts, not opinions. How this is written.
What went well
- Reached a running state on a clean machine, with the session recorded.
- Installed in 0 minutes.
- Recovered from all 1 error without a human stepping in, which says the failures are documented well enough to solve.
- Ran without a GPU, so it does not need one to start.
- Licensed Apache-2.0, as reported by its host.
What did not, or is not known
- Measured once so far. A single attempt shows it can run, not that it runs reliably.
What it is a reasonable choice for
- Trying it on a laptop or a small server: it reached a running state without a GPU.
- A quick evaluation: it was running 0 minutes after the clone.
Run history
Topics (from GitHub)
Embed the badge
Markdown for the project README. It links back here; terms on the terms page.
[](https://argusic.com/subject/across)Questions
- Does across run?
- Yes. across runs. Argusic installed and launched it on a clean machine in 0 minutes, hitting 1 error on the way, and recorded the session.
- How did Argusic test across?
- On a fresh, disposable machine, with every command recorded and the repository pinned at commit fdb40962837b. One attempt is recorded, and the full method is on the methodology page.
- What did it cost to test across?
- The run that produced this verdict cost $0.05: real compute and model cost, not a list price per million tokens. It is recorded on that run's page.
- How long does across take to install?
- 0 minutes in the run that decided this verdict, from a clean machine to a running state. That is one measured attempt, not an average.
- Does across need a GPU?
- Not to start. Argusic reached a running state on a machine with no GPU.
- What goes wrong when installing across?
- 1 thing broke in the recorded run, and 1 were fixed without human help. Each one, and the time it cost, is listed on this page.
- Where is the evidence for across?
- The recorded run is on this page, each linking to its full log and terminal recording, stored with a sha256 fingerprint so it cannot be quietly altered.